We're moving Forums to the Community pages. Click here for more information and updates.

Does Harold deserve to be picked on by Duncan and Courtney so much?

Does Harold deserve to be picked on so much?

  • Avatar of Brodoin15

    Brodoin15

    [301]Oct 6, 2009
    • member since: 05/21/07
    • level: 20
    • rank: Cow Bell
    • posts: 2,478
    Diddy_2000 wrote:
    BrainMan820 wrote:

    We saw the chart just fine, it's just that you arbitrarily assigned numbers to somehow prove that Harold > Courtney. That's not how charts work.

    As of yet, no one has proven where Courtney has broken the rules. Delivering a lawsuit against Chris, and winning, is not breaking the rules. From her victory, it was clear that Courtney's lawyers argued a position that she was terminated from competition unsuccessfully. That's not breaking a rule. Quite the opposite, that's Courtney calling Chris out for breaking a rule.

    Courtney received immunity her first week back because of the lawsuit; that's not breaking a rule since it was established beforehand, and all other Grips were aware of the rule (they, in fact, were the ones that broke it.) Courtney's matches were also not unfairly set up by Chris: He chose who fought who in "BC" and "Million Dollar Babies" was established due to tier rankings during the football training. The fact that Duncan and Courtney did worse then Justin and Leshawna, but better than everyone else, is not unfair.

    And imverybasic, you make absolutely no sense whatsoever. How, exactly, do ANY of Courtney's victories in the challenges come from her lawyers? She defeated Duncan by kneeing him in the crotch, by pinning him in wrestling, getting through a laser grid, making a better superhero costume, and accomplishing an obstacle course the fastest. Not a single one of these came from her lawyers; the latter three, she was actually unable to reach them. Courtney accomplished this ON HER OWN. Do not let your personal opinion of her disguise the facts. She wasn't compassionate for Geoff's injury because, let's face it, he had a splinter.

    alagaseian, your "justifications" are even worse. You claim that Chris did nothing because he's afraid of a lawsuit, but can't even prove it. Beth is the only one who whines that it's not fair Courtney gets perks. It's true that Chris does not appear to be happy about it during "BC" but after that, he never mentions it again. You use a flimsy pretext to get Harold off the hook, and then hypocritically backtrack just to penalize Courtney. Sad. Really sad.

    And you guys are way off-topic. No one has yet to reply to such things as "Courtney coming back does not exonerate Harold, since he had nothing to do with it." This just denigrated into whiny Courtney-bashing and mindless Harold-praise.

    Q.F.T. Brainman you really bring up good points that actually make sense

    1) To Brainman: I used numbers to show Harold earns more points. Courtney is good at challenges, but not well with others. Harold is both good at challenges, and pretty good with others.

    How isn't that a good example? Please tell.

    2) To Diddy: I think everyone else has made perfect points and sense.

    You must be registered and logged in to post a message.
  • Avatar of alagaesian

    alagaesian

    [302]Oct 6, 2009
    • member since: 12/17/07
    • level: 12
    • rank: Evil Bert
    • posts: 1,098
    Careful, Brodoin. Now Brainman is going to define 'good with others' to include blackmail, lying, and manipulation of other characters. You might want to consider a better choice of words.

    Or, Brainman could simply state that being 'good with others' doesn't matter if you win invincibility every round, or have a boyfriend that will beat up anyone who disagrees with her.
    You must be registered and logged in to post a message.
  • Avatar of BrainMan820

    BrainMan820

    [303]Oct 6, 2009
    • member since: 12/10/04
    • level: 16
    • rank: Church Lady
    • posts: 808

    alagaesian wrote:
    Mindless Harold-praise? I've flat-out admitted that Courtney is better at challenges than him. I'm just trying to prove at this point that he is a protagonist, and that Courtney is lower morally than him. I could consider your argument to be flimsy because it is throwing ethics out the window concerning the game. It is an element that is essential to proving how moral someone is, because morals are just an expression of ethics. But, I'm going along with it because I know I can't prove my point if I try to base an argument on something you won't even consider. Basically, if you throw everything out but the most simple and sacred morals, here are the points against each individual: Harold - illegally switched the votes Courtney - threatened to let four people die if they didn't give her the case If I am missing something fundamental to the debate, let me know. I'd hate for you to completely discredit me simply for forgetting the details. As for Courtney coming back, let's put it this way: Harold stole a chance from Courtney, and Courtney got it back tenfold. Not to mention that she was forcing him into a state of distress and then beating him senseless at Playa de Losers, and that her boyfriend was also taking revenge on him throughout most of TDA's episodes. I personally believe that this compensates for Harold's cheating fully, as there is no overall harm done to Courtney, and Harold has been reprimanded harshly for his actions.

    Courtney has nothing to do with whether Harold is a protagonist or not. You've only been bashing Courtney, you haven't brought up what makes Harold a paragon of virtue or anything. He's not done anything good, and he's been behind Heather (of all people) when it comes to teamwork and working together. You don't see him being nice to Duncan.

    Your justification for Harold being redeemed is pathetic. Courtney had the right to take revenge on him at Playa de Losers because, let's face it, he kicked her off unfairly. Duncan was also hurt by what happened, and he picked on Harold for it. Further, as stated, Courtney's return to TDA was not something Harold had a part in: Michael did. Courtney got her revenge on him, but that doesn't mean Harold is redeemed, because he did not willingly agree to let Courtney hurt him or anything like that. He hid like a coward.



    Brodoin, the fact that you used numbers doesn't make something objective. You assigned value to the numbers based on your subjective opinions. It's the same thing as saying "Harold's nicer, so he's better then Courtney despite her challenge victories." You need to show legitimate reasons why the numbers are the way they are. You assigned Harold a "5" in teamwork, but how exactly is that reached? Harold is the butt of everyone's joke and only works with a group because they are team challenges. Further, you assign Courtney a "1' but fail to grasp that she succesfully manipulated Harold to vote off his own crush. That counts for a lot as far as people go.
    You must be registered and logged in to post a message.
  • Avatar of imverybasic

    imverybasic

    [304]Oct 6, 2009
    • member since: 07/09/06
    • level: 16
    • rank: Church Lady
    • posts: 3,060
    BrainMan820 wrote:
    We saw the chart just fine, it's just that you arbitrarily assigned numbers to somehow prove that Harold > Courtney. That's not how charts work.

    As of yet, no one has proven where Courtney has broken the rules. Delivering a lawsuit against Chris, and winning, is not breaking the rules. From her victory, it was clear that Courtney's lawyers argued a position that she was terminated from competition unsuccessfully. That's not breaking a rule. Quite the opposite, that's Courtney calling Chris out for breaking a rule.

    Courtney received immunity her first week back because of the lawsuit; that's not breaking a rule since it was established beforehand, and all other Grips were aware of the rule (they, in fact, were the ones that broke it.) Courtney's matches were also not unfairly set up by Chris: He chose who fought who in "BC" and "Million Dollar Babies" was established due to tier rankings during the football training. The fact that Duncan and Courtney did worse then Justin and Leshawna, but better than everyone else, is not unfair.

    It is unfair because she caused the second part of the challenge. She built the go kart and lead the team. The go kart wasn't stirdy enough so it fell apart. Her and Owen both costed the game. The Grips could have voted Courtney off also because Owen was well-liked, but because of the immunity that she was granted, was safe from being eliminated. The Grips weren't informed about Courtney's immunity until the Guilded Chris Ceremony.

    BrainMan820 wrote:
    And imverybasic, you make absolutely no sense whatsoever. How, exactly, do ANY of Courtney's victories in the challenges come from her lawyers? She defeated Duncan by kneeing him in the crotch, by pinning him in wrestling, getting through a laser grid, making a better superhero costume, and accomplishing an obstacle course the fastest. Not a single one of these came from her lawyers; the latter three, she was actually unable to reach them. Courtney accomplished this ON HER OWN. Do not let your personal opinion of her disguise the facts. She wasn't compassionate for Geoff's injury because, let's face it, he had a splinter.

    You seem to be missing my point. Chris set up the match between Duncan and Courtney in Million Bucks BC. It's pretty much a given that he did it for his own sick amusement, but part of it was to make sure that Courtney won the challenge. And Chris knows as much as anyone on the show that Courtney and Duncan were once an item and now Courtney has a score to settle with him. He knew this and figured that it was the only way if she won. Usually when things don't go her way, Courtney does something about it. And now that she has the rightful power to sue, if she doesn't win, she'll go on with suing the show and put Chris out of a job. In Million Dollar Babies, the matches were established based on the rankings of the players from the previous challenge. This is true. But again, Courtney is set to fight Duncan. It's arguable to say that like in BC, Duncan was thrown off his game having to fight Courtney. He was almost willing to pull a Trent and throw the challenge for her, but wasn't about to admit that he was weak. He did however say "she's not a girl, she's Courtney," at the Guilded Chris Ceremony. This is symbolic, telling us that he couldn't bring himself to fight his girlfriend. Totally had nothing to do with the lawsuit. Then again, Chris's technique about the rankings could have been a cover-up, and was just trying to help Courtney win. That's debatable, though. As for Geoff's injury, the challenge was a team challenge so no one was allowed to be left behind. Plus Courtney had a larger bone and could have easily knocked Duncan into the tarpit being on a separate column as him. Lindsay made fire which won them the challenge, but Chris is going out of his way to help Courtney win some challenges, to prevent getting sued.

    BrainMan820 wrote:
    alagaseian, your "justifications" are even worse. You claim that Chris did nothing because he's afraid of a lawsuit, but can't even prove it. Beth is the only one who whines that it's not fair Courtney gets perks. It's true that Chris does not appear to be happy about it during "BC" but after that, he never mentions it again.

    This isn't true. Beth wasn't the only one who complained. Everybody was against the idea of Courtney getting the extra perks. Episodes on, people kept talking about it and about booting Courtney from the competition.

    BrainMan820 wrote:
    And you guys are way off-topic. No one has yet to reply to such things as "Courtney coming back does not exonerate Harold, since he had nothing to do with it." This just denigrated into whiny Courtney-bashing and mindless Harold-praise.

    Harold had nothing to do with Courtney coming back. Courtney was just lucky to be back.

    [/QUOTE]
    You must be registered and logged in to post a message.
  • Avatar of BrainMan820

    BrainMan820

    [305]Oct 6, 2009
    • member since: 12/10/04
    • level: 16
    • rank: Church Lady
    • posts: 808

    If you recall, and please watch the episode again since your facts are faulty, Courtney had no choice but to carry the cart since Justin wasn't constructing the body and their tires were destroyed by Owen. Without tires, that kart isn't going to run. Period. You would have to carry it.

    Oh, so now Chris set up the challenge between Duncan and Courtney so that Courtney would win? Prove it. Wait, you can't, because if you did, you would have provided more then just your lame opinion. Duncan and Courtney were the last two competitors. Further, the only reason they could only use one column was that the other was destroyed by the beavers. I'm willing to agree that Chris liked the sick twisted amusement of pitting the two against each other, but it's not because Courtney could win. After all, if you recall later in the episode, Chris wanted to see Courtney get hurt, and he made a big deal about making sure everyone knew she had an unfair advantage. Why would he do that if he wanted her to win?

    Duncan was NOT willing to pull a Trent in "Million Dollar Babies." He states in the episode that he won't do it because of Trent and Gwen. And he still wrestled her, which should further hammer the point that Duncan is trying to win.

    The reason Courtney got a larger bone is because Lindsay. a Killer Grip, won the challenge and made fire. Because of this, all Killer Grips got larger bones. Courtney is a Killer Grip. You are just really going out of your way to demonize Courtney. Jeez, why don't you just look at the facts.

    Actually, after "BC" no one was talking about her perks. Beth took her PDA, everyone agreed to use it to see Leshawna's insults, Duncan trusted it to help in the spy challenges, but no one complained about Courtney getting perks.

    Do us a favor, and start using the facts to back up your opinions rather then conspiracy theories.

    You must be registered and logged in to post a message.
  • Avatar of n5d25d90

    n5d25d90

    [306]Oct 6, 2009
    • member since: 06/18/05
    • level: 8
    • rank: Super-Friend
    • posts: 273
    BrainMan820 wrote:

    alagaesian wrote:
    Mindless Harold-praise? I've flat-out admitted that Courtney is better at challenges than him. I'm just trying to prove at this point that he is a protagonist, and that Courtney is lower morally than him. I could consider your argument to be flimsy because it is throwing ethics out the window concerning the game. It is an element that is essential to proving how moral someone is, because morals are just an expression of ethics. But, I'm going along with it because I know I can't prove my point if I try to base an argument on something you won't even consider. Basically, if you throw everything out but the most simple and sacred morals, here are the points against each individual: Harold - illegally switched the votes Courtney - threatened to let four people die if they didn't give her the case If I am missing something fundamental to the debate, let me know. I'd hate for you to completely discredit me simply for forgetting the details. As for Courtney coming back, let's put it this way: Harold stole a chance from Courtney, and Courtney got it back tenfold. Not to mention that she was forcing him into a state of distress and then beating him senseless at Playa de Losers, and that her boyfriend was also taking revenge on him throughout most of TDA's episodes. I personally believe that this compensates for Harold's cheating fully, as there is no overall harm done to Courtney, and Harold has been reprimanded harshly for his actions.

    Courtney has nothing to do with whether Harold is a protagonist or not. You've only been bashing Courtney, you haven't brought up what makes Harold a paragon of virtue or anything. He's not done anything good, and he's been behind Heather (of all people) when it comes to teamwork and working together. You don't see him being nice to Duncan.

    Your justification for Harold being redeemed is pathetic. Courtney had the right to take revenge on him at Playa de Losers because, let's face it, he kicked her off unfairly. Duncan was also hurt by what happened, and he picked on Harold for it. Further, as stated, Courtney's return to TDA was not something Harold had a part in: Michael did. Courtney got her revenge on him, but that doesn't mean Harold is redeemed, because he did not willingly agree to let Courtney hurt him or anything like that. He hid like a coward.



    Brodoin, the fact that you used numbers doesn't make something objective. You assigned value to the numbers based on your subjective opinions. It's the same thing as saying "Harold's nicer, so he's better then Courtney despite her challenge victories." You need to show legitimate reasons why the numbers are the way they are. You assigned Harold a "5" in teamwork, but how exactly is that reached? Harold is the butt of everyone's joke and only works with a group because they are team challenges. Further, you assign Courtney a "1' but fail to grasp that she succesfully manipulated Harold to vote off his own crush. That counts for a lot as far as people go.


    I'm sorry, but when the crap did anyone say Harold was a paragon of virtue?

    I have read everyone's points, and just about everyone had good points. You, Brodoin, imverybasic, you're all providing points that make sense and actually help your case, unlike the likes of Coconut, Diddy, and HaydenAvery who do a very poor job at debating. But I ask... this is a debate, not a bashfest. And I'm not talking about Courtney because from what I've seen no one is trying to bash Courtney. I'm talking about you debaters bashing each other. Especially you.

    Debates are meant to see two sides of one story. Otherwise it wouldn't be a debate. And unfortunately many people forget that and instead use debates as means of trying to prove that what they're saying is absolute fact.

    Now, as of this moment, I have nothing to add to this debate. But I suggest that those who are acting like a bunch of whiny little brats to please not do so anymore? This is a freaking cartoon, for God's sake. Geez!
    You must be registered and logged in to post a message.
  • Avatar of BrainMan820

    BrainMan820

    [307]Oct 7, 2009
    • member since: 12/10/04
    • level: 16
    • rank: Church Lady
    • posts: 808
    n5d25d90 wrote:
    BrainMan820 wrote:

    alagaesian wrote:
    Mindless Harold-praise? I've flat-out admitted that Courtney is better at challenges than him. I'm just trying to prove at this point that he is a protagonist, and that Courtney is lower morally than him. I could consider your argument to be flimsy because it is throwing ethics out the window concerning the game. It is an element that is essential to proving how moral someone is, because morals are just an expression of ethics. But, I'm going along with it because I know I can't prove my point if I try to base an argument on something you won't even consider. Basically, if you throw everything out but the most simple and sacred morals, here are the points against each individual: Harold - illegally switched the votes Courtney - threatened to let four people die if they didn't give her the case If I am missing something fundamental to the debate, let me know. I'd hate for you to completely discredit me simply for forgetting the details. As for Courtney coming back, let's put it this way: Harold stole a chance from Courtney, and Courtney got it back tenfold. Not to mention that she was forcing him into a state of distress and then beating him senseless at Playa de Losers, and that her boyfriend was also taking revenge on him throughout most of TDA's episodes. I personally believe that this compensates for Harold's cheating fully, as there is no overall harm done to Courtney, and Harold has been reprimanded harshly for his actions.

    Courtney has nothing to do with whether Harold is a protagonist or not. You've only been bashing Courtney, you haven't brought up what makes Harold a paragon of virtue or anything. He's not done anything good, and he's been behind Heather (of all people) when it comes to teamwork and working together. You don't see him being nice to Duncan.

    Your justification for Harold being redeemed is pathetic. Courtney had the right to take revenge on him at Playa de Losers because, let's face it, he kicked her off unfairly. Duncan was also hurt by what happened, and he picked on Harold for it. Further, as stated, Courtney's return to TDA was not something Harold had a part in: Michael did. Courtney got her revenge on him, but that doesn't mean Harold is redeemed, because he did not willingly agree to let Courtney hurt him or anything like that. He hid like a coward.



    Brodoin, the fact that you used numbers doesn't make something objective. You assigned value to the numbers based on your subjective opinions. It's the same thing as saying "Harold's nicer, so he's better then Courtney despite her challenge victories." You need to show legitimate reasons why the numbers are the way they are. You assigned Harold a "5" in teamwork, but how exactly is that reached? Harold is the butt of everyone's joke and only works with a group because they are team challenges. Further, you assign Courtney a "1' but fail to grasp that she succesfully manipulated Harold to vote off his own crush. That counts for a lot as far as people go.

    I'm sorry, but when the crap did anyone say Harold was a paragon of virtue? I have read everyone's points, and just about everyone had good points. You, Brodoin, imverybasic, you're all providing points that make sense and actually help your case, unlike the likes of Coconut, Diddy, and HaydenAvery who do a very poor job at debating. But I ask... this is a debate, not a bashfest. And I'm not talking about Courtney because from what I've seen no one is trying to bash Courtney. I'm talking about you debaters bashing each other. Especially you. Debates are meant to see two sides of one story. Otherwise it wouldn't be a debate. And unfortunately many people forget that and instead use debates as means of trying to prove that what they're saying is absolute fact. Now, as of this moment, I have nothing to add to this debate. But I suggest that those who are acting like a bunch of whiny little brats to please not do so anymore? This is a freaking cartoon, for God's sake. Geez!

    Please read the post again. I stated that no one was bringing up what made Harold a paragon of virtue, and were merely bashing Courtney and justifying his behavior. That coincides with your point.

    If you think I'm bashing, I'm will neither change your opinion nor justify it. It's the most expendient course of action considering that the facts omitted from the arguments made would be easily solved by re-watching the episode. I don't insult the people, I insult the argument, and then suggest what the people should do in order not to make such basic mistakes. That's the explanation. Take whatever you want from it.

    You must be registered and logged in to post a message.
  • Avatar of alagaesian

    alagaesian

    [308]Oct 7, 2009
    • member since: 12/17/07
    • level: 12
    • rank: Evil Bert
    • posts: 1,098
    My justification for Harold's redemption was just my opinion. I wasn't trying to make an argument point out of it. You mentioned that we'd completely abandoned that facet of the debate, so I brought up what I thought of that situation and why. I personally believe that Courtney should not be mad because she didn't lose anything and Harold has had to live in harsh treatment ever since. But, you are welcome to think of that a different way because your personal opinions are obviously different than mine.

    I also think it's kind of hard to apologize to someone who is hunting you with a lamppost, so you can't even step out in the open without getting pulverized. You have argued that Harold has never tried to apologize for her, but I believe that she never gave him the chance to. You make a good point in saying that Harold hid instead of letting Courtney hurt him, but I believe that her death threats are a decent excuse for anyone to be scared and hide. If you think differently then that, imagine what you would do if you had an enraged Courtney threatening to wring your neck. And if you still believe he should have stepped out and allowed Courtney to go berserk on him, then our beliefs contrast so fully in this point that neither of us can convince the other, and we should drop this point in the debate.

    And, yes, Harold has shown some morality to Duncan. Look at Full Metal Drama. As soon as Duncan apologized, Harold started working with him like he had no grudge whatsoever. He has also given Heather, of all people, a second chance to be forgiven after stealing the case and taking his homemade hang-glider. He is at least willing to forgive some people for their actions, unlike Duncan, who has been tormenting him since TDA started.
    You must be registered and logged in to post a message.
  • Avatar of imverybasic

    imverybasic

    [309]Oct 7, 2009
    • member since: 07/09/06
    • level: 16
    • rank: Church Lady
    • posts: 3,060

    Let's put it this way:

    Harold is good in TDI, Courtney is good in TDA

    Both have been given a chance at redemtion and to prove that neither one is useless. That's that.

    I'm simply not bashing Courtney, just giving points to back up in my defense over Harold. As much as I loathe Courtney with a burning passion, I try to be as fair in my arguments as I possibly can. Courtney's doing well this season, but even in TDA, it's hard for me to give her credit seeing as she has a lawsuit as a safety net. She has accomplished some of the chalenges on her own, but even between breaks, she's been trying to call her lawyers to either get her out of things or to make sure that no one but herself wins the million dollar prize. And even with all the out-of-office replies that she recieves, Courtney would rather call Michael, use her brain second. With all the out-of-office replies that she's getting, Courtney then has no choice but to use her brain to get her out of situations, which is not what makes a good competitor. Harold on the other hand, has proven that he could work well in both team challenges and individual challenges. He has proven that he could work well under any circumstance, whether it is at his own pace or under pressure and he knows just as well that he were in any kind of danger, he could come up with creative ways to get out of it.

    Secondly, even in the new season, it's pretty close between Courtney and Harold. Here are my justifications on that:

    Harold originally ended up getting chosen to compete in the new season, not Courtney. In TDDDDI, Chris set up a challenge for the twenty-two campers to find a suitcase with a million dollars inside. In the end, fourteen contestants landed in the water which happened to be the given destination of the challenge. Chris then said that fourteen of those contestants were then chosen to compete in the new season. One of those contestants was Harold, not Courtney.

    While Harold was chosen to compete, Courtney went out of her way to file a case to be on the show. If Chris failed to let her on the show, the show would have been sued. This is unfair.

    Courtney was granted immunity for her first week back. Yes, Owen costed the challenge by having the wheels burnt. Courtney however leaded the team and even though Owen costed more of the challenge, Courtney was the next in line voted off since Owen was liked. But since Courtney was granted immunity from her lawsuit, the others had no choice but to vote Owen off. This isn't considered unfair since Owen ruined the challenge. My point is that if it weren't for being granted invincibility, she would have been voted off.

    While the others have to settle for eating Chef's gruel, sleeping in the same trailer and sharing the same bathroom, Courtney is given a gourment dining menu every episode, a private bathroom, a comforter, a phone to contact Michael and a PDA (with built in GPS). Being well fed and kept usually helps athletes stay better focused and in top shape to compete better.

    Courtney has done well in challenges. Unfortunately, there are a couple of drawbacks to her accomplishing this:

    - Courtney has proven that she can't work well under certain conditions. She needs pampering, contact with the outside world, gourment dining, etc...

    - Courtney has shown that she has the raw physical skill to win individual challenge, but lacks working in team challenges.

    Harold has also done well in challenges...

    - He has proven that he could work well any circumstance (is able to get productive)

    - He is both a good competitor and a team player

    - He's morally just. He could set things aside to assist other people and still stay better focused in challenges

    - He posesses the same amount of good leadership skills as Courtney

    While Courtney may be beating him in challenges this season, Harold still manages to come pretty close. And like algaesian says, the show is not all about challenge performances. While it is a major part of this show, you need other types of skills and knowledge to balance you out as a competitor. Courtney may have physical strength, which is something that Harold lacks, that is all she has. It's useful, but it won't always help you get by. You need brains and brawn.

    You must be registered and logged in to post a message.
  • Avatar of imverybasic

    imverybasic

    [310]Oct 7, 2009
    • member since: 07/09/06
    • level: 16
    • rank: Church Lady
    • posts: 3,060

    (Sorry for the double post)

    By the way, even if the Grips were to have the wheels for the challenge. I agree that it would have ran better, but it doesn't neccessarily mean that the Grips would have won. Seeing that Duncan had building experience andthe cart was built a little more stirdier, the race still would have been close.

    You must be registered and logged in to post a message.
  • Avatar of Brodoin15

    Brodoin15

    [311]Oct 7, 2009
    • member since: 05/21/07
    • level: 20
    • rank: Cow Bell
    • posts: 2,478
    imverybasic wrote:

    Let's put it this way:

    Harold is good in TDI, Courtney is good in TDA

    Both have been given a chance at redemtion and to prove that neither one is useless. That's that.

    I'm simply not bashing Courtney, just giving points to back up in my defense over Harold. As much as I loathe Courtney with a burning passion, I try to be as fair in my arguments as I possibly can. Courtney's doing well this season, but even in TDA, it's hard for me to give her credit seeing as she has a lawsuit as a safety net. She has accomplished some of the chalenges on her own, but even between breaks, she's been trying to call her lawyers to either get her out of things or to make sure that no one but herself wins the million dollar prize. And even with all the out-of-office replies that she recieves, Courtney would rather call Michael, use her brain second. With all the out-of-office replies that she's getting, Courtney then has no choice but to use her brain to get her out of situations, which is not what makes a good competitor. Harold on the other hand, has proven that he could work well in both team challenges and individual challenges. He has proven that he could work well under any circumstance, whether it is at his own pace or under pressure and he knows just as well that he were in any kind of danger, he could come up with creative ways to get out of it.

    Secondly, even in the new season, it's pretty close between Courtney and Harold. Here are my justifications on that:

    Harold originally ended up getting chosen to compete in the new season, not Courtney. In TDDDDI, Chris set up a challenge for the twenty-two campers to find a suitcase with a million dollars inside. In the end, fourteen contestants landed in the water which happened to be the given destination of the challenge. Chris then said that fourteen of those contestants were then chosen to compete in the new season. One of those contestants was Harold, not Courtney.

    While Harold was chosen to compete, Courtney went out of her way to file a case to be on the show. If Chris failed to let her on the show, the show would have been sued. This is unfair.

    Courtney was granted immunity for her first week back. Yes, Owen costed the challenge by having the wheels burnt. Courtney however leaded the team and even though Owen costed more of the challenge, Courtney was the next in line voted off since Owen was liked. But since Courtney was granted immunity from her lawsuit, the others had no choice but to vote Owen off. This isn't considered unfair since Owen ruined the challenge. My point is that if it weren't for being granted invincibility, she would have been voted off.

    While the others have to settle for eating Chef's gruel, sleeping in the same trailer and sharing the same bathroom, Courtney is given a gourment dining menu every episode, a private bathroom, a comforter, a phone to contact Michael and a PDA (with built in GPS). Being well fed and kept usually helps athletes stay better focused and in top shape to compete better.

    Courtney has done well in challenges. Unfortunately, there are a couple of drawbacks to her accomplishing this:

    - Courtney has proven that she can't work well under certain conditions. She needs pampering, contact with the outside world, gourment dining, etc...

    - Courtney has shown that she has the raw physical skill to win individual challenge, but lacks working in team challenges.

    Harold has also done well in challenges...

    - He has proven that he could work well any circumstance (is able to get productive)

    - He is both a good competitor and a team player

    - He's morally just. He could set things aside to assist other people and still stay better focused in challenges

    - He posesses the same amount of good leadership skills as Courtney

    While Courtney may be beating him in challenges this season, Harold still manages to come pretty close. And like algaesian says, the show is not all about challenge performances. While it is a major part of this show, you need other types of skills and knowledge to balance you out as a competitor. Courtney may have physical strength, which is something that Harold lacks, that is all she has. It's useful, but it won't always help you get by. You need brains and brawn.

    Yes yes yes. Very good. Could never have said it better myself.

    You must be registered and logged in to post a message.
  • Avatar of Riankg

    Riankg

    [312]Oct 7, 2009
    • member since: 04/21/09
    • level: 6
    • rank: Small Wonder
    • posts: 373
    Brodoin15 wrote:
    imverybasic wrote:

    Let's put it this way:

    Harold is good in TDI, Courtney is good in TDA

    Both have been given a chance at redemtion and to prove that neither one is useless. That's that.

    I'm simply not bashing Courtney, just giving points to back up in my defense over Harold. As much as I loathe Courtney with a burning passion, I try to be as fair in my arguments as I possibly can. Courtney's doing well this season, but even in TDA, it's hard for me to give her credit seeing as she has a lawsuit as a safety net. She has accomplished some of the chalenges on her own, but even between breaks, she's been trying to call her lawyers to either get her out of things or to make sure that no one but herself wins the million dollar prize. And even with all the out-of-office replies that she recieves, Courtney would rather call Michael, use her brain second. With all the out-of-office replies that she's getting, Courtney then has no choice but to use her brain to get her out of situations, which is not what makes a good competitor. Harold on the other hand, has proven that he could work well in both team challenges and individual challenges. He has proven that he could work well under any circumstance, whether it is at his own pace or under pressure and he knows just as well that he were in any kind of danger, he could come up with creative ways to get out of it.

    Secondly, even in the new season, it's pretty close between Courtney and Harold. Here are my justifications on that:

    Harold originally ended up getting chosen to compete in the new season, not Courtney. In TDDDDI, Chris set up a challenge for the twenty-two campers to find a suitcase with a million dollars inside. In the end, fourteen contestants landed in the water which happened to be the given destination of the challenge. Chris then said that fourteen of those contestants were then chosen to compete in the new season. One of those contestants was Harold, not Courtney.

    While Harold was chosen to compete, Courtney went out of her way to file a case to be on the show. If Chris failed to let her on the show, the show would have been sued. This is unfair.

    Courtney was granted immunity for her first week back. Yes, Owen costed the challenge by having the wheels burnt. Courtney however leaded the team and even though Owen costed more of the challenge, Courtney was the next in line voted off since Owen was liked. But since Courtney was granted immunity from her lawsuit, the others had no choice but to vote Owen off. This isn't considered unfair since Owen ruined the challenge. My point is that if it weren't for being granted invincibility, she would have been voted off.

    While the others have to settle for eating Chef's gruel, sleeping in the same trailer and sharing the same bathroom, Courtney is given a gourment dining menu every episode, a private bathroom, a comforter, a phone to contact Michael and a PDA (with built in GPS). Being well fed and kept usually helps athletes stay better focused and in top shape to compete better.

    Courtney has done well in challenges. Unfortunately, there are a couple of drawbacks to her accomplishing this:

    - Courtney has proven that she can't work well under certain conditions. She needs pampering, contact with the outside world, gourment dining, etc...

    - Courtney has shown that she has the raw physical skill to win individual challenge, but lacks working in team challenges.

    Harold has also done well in challenges...

    - He has proven that he could work well any circumstance (is able to get productive)

    - He is both a good competitor and a team player

    - He's morally just. He could set things aside to assist other people and still stay better focused in challenges

    - He posesses the same amount of good leadership skills as Courtney

    While Courtney may be beating him in challenges this season, Harold still manages to come pretty close. And like algaesian says, the show is not all about challenge performances. While it is a major part of this show, you need other types of skills and knowledge to balance you out as a competitor. Courtney may have physical strength, which is something that Harold lacks, that is all she has. It's useful, but it won't always help you get by. You need brains and brawn.

    Yes yes yes. Very good. Could never have said it better myself.



    Agree as well..the only thing i would change is that Harold isnt a great leader as Courtney. Yes he has the brains and bla bla bla..i totally agree with that, but the thing is that few people like him or respect him..Duncan doesnt pay attencion on him, Leshawna likes him, but in many ocasions she didnt really listened to him, Heather hates him, Dj never showed some conflict with him and Gwen didnt really think that he was a great player. But it's just a small thing compared with the others good things that you listed about him, so still he is a really good player.
    You must be registered and logged in to post a message.
  • Avatar of Brodoin15

    Brodoin15

    [313]Oct 7, 2009
    • member since: 05/21/07
    • level: 20
    • rank: Cow Bell
    • posts: 2,478

    Personally, I think the fact that Harold is willing to save everyone's lives in that one episode, including Heather and Duncan, not to mention giving Duncan and Heather another chance, while on the other hand Courtney is willing to turn on anyone, and was even willing to kill Tyler, Cody, Owen and DJ for the million dollars make Harold better.

    Not even mentioning challenges in which he has won, or came close to winning.

    You must be registered and logged in to post a message.
  • Avatar of imverybasic

    imverybasic

    [314]Oct 7, 2009
    • member since: 07/09/06
    • level: 16
    • rank: Church Lady
    • posts: 3,060
    Betrayal is usually common in a competition, mainly because the competitor doesn't want to get sidetracked. It's pretty hard to set aside your needs to help others and still manage to get back in the game. The fact that Harold is able to pull that off makes him better than Courtney. Courtney is a good leader but didn't do too well in TDI. At least in TDA, she's given a second chance to redeem herself. The problem being however is that she is only able to deliver in the individual challenges, not so much the team challenges. Whereas Harold is able to do both. Even from all the times he has been sidetracked (i.e., having his underwear made into a sandwich), has managed to make a comeback.
    You must be registered and logged in to post a message.
  • Avatar of HaydenAvery

    HaydenAvery

    [315]Oct 7, 2009
    • member since: 07/05/09
    • level: 21
    • rank: Snagglepuss
    • posts: 8,574
    how am i not making good points? this thread is getting useless though. no matter how much evidence you show brainman or diddy theyll just push it aside because they are the most biased people here. yes courtney has a possibility of being better than harold or maybe there tied. but harolds extra nice points make him the better player. people think courtney or harold will be in the final 2 with beth. so i say whoever gets farther will be deemed the better player so we can hopefully end this.
    You must be registered and logged in to post a message.
  • Avatar of imverybasic

    imverybasic

    [316]Oct 7, 2009
    • member since: 07/09/06
    • level: 16
    • rank: Church Lady
    • posts: 3,060

    Personally, I think that this thread should be locked because this argument has been going on for a long time. It's been going on for 16 pages worth and both parties have not reached an agreement or a compromise. Plus we've gone way off-track with this argument, when the real thing that we should be discussing about is whether Harold deserves to be picked on or not.

    On a side note, though: I think Justin will make it to the final 6, maybe a little past that. I agree with you HaydenAvery that Justin is starting to have more villainous tendencies, suggesting on voting off the girls. It's not exactly considered evil since Duncan had the idea last season but for Justin, it's a step up. I think that the writers have run out of stuff to write about Justin, so I think he'll go soon. I predict he'll last between the final 6 to the final 3.

    You must be registered and logged in to post a message.
  • Avatar of n5d25d90

    n5d25d90

    [317]Oct 7, 2009
    • member since: 06/18/05
    • level: 8
    • rank: Super-Friend
    • posts: 273
    I apologize for flying off the handle before. I wasn't in the greatest of moods last night. College stress, man... Bleh!

    Still, though, I believe that debates like these can go a long way if people respect each others' opinions and quit discrediting people because they believe something else. Again, I found that several of you, on both sides of the spectrum, have some pretty good points, but it's merely shadowed by the onslaught of biased hatred for certain characters or ideas.

    And also, I agree with imverybasic, this thread went off on a tangent quite a few times. Maybe it's time we just end it.
    You must be registered and logged in to post a message.
  • Avatar of Brodoin15

    Brodoin15

    [318]Oct 7, 2009
    • member since: 05/21/07
    • level: 20
    • rank: Cow Bell
    • posts: 2,478

    Personally, I don't hate Courtney. She's not a favourite, and I do like Harold better, but I don't hate her.

    Like a friend of mine said, it seems as if someone likes Harold, some people automatically place him/her as hating Courtney, and vice versa.

    In case this is locked, I will post a on-topic post.

    Harold does not deserve to be picked on anymore. Granted, some revenge on him by Courtney and maybe Duncan is understandable, but now, it should stop. Harold should not need to apologize for his revenge taking, as Duncan never apologized for his torments. Harold even seemed willing to forgive Duncan in one episode of TDI, as he accepted his apology and took the "juice" which was also a prank of a cup of grease. He seemed to forgive him again in TDA. Courtney and Duncan had their revenge. You cannot expect Harold to apologize, when Duncan and Courtney never apologized for anything they did to hime before Harold took his revenge.

    Now, I don't agree with revenge taking, but you wouldn't apologize to a bully for taking revenge on him, would you? Of course not.

    Besides, it is technically Duncan's fault for the whole thing. If he wasn't a bully that felt the need to pick on him, Harold never would have felt the need to take revenge on Duncan. It may be indirectly, but it was still Duncan's doing that caused the whole thing.

    Edited on 10/07/2009 6:57pm
    You must be registered and logged in to post a message.
  • Avatar of BrainMan820

    BrainMan820

    [319]Oct 7, 2009
    • member since: 12/10/04
    • level: 16
    • rank: Church Lady
    • posts: 808

    Courtney's lawsuit is not a safety net: Chris has out and out stated she can be voted off.

    As for calling Michael, please recall that it is a tactic that works: She got back on the show because of him. Courtney is merely using a weapon to it's best advantage, which is what anyone does on these sorts of shows. At least, they do if they want to win. The fact that Courtney is willing to use a proven tactic doesn't make her inferior. By contrast, Harold really hasn't shown that sort of power. He's taken a backseat to Duncan as far as the challenges are concerned: bombed horribly in Beach Blanket Bogus, was picked last for the teams, and the list goes on.

    The fact that Harold was on a certain side of the dock was mere chance. Everyone merely got dragged along. Harold did not plan on this; it cannot be counted to his favor.

    Actually, the show WAS used, it was not a threat. Courtney successfully brought a lawsuit against the show and was brought back, and garnered some hefty rewards for it. Without seeing the lawsuit, how can one say that Chris gave her extra perks merely to avoid being sued again, or if they were rewards in addition because her position was terminated unsuccessfully.

    As for Owen's elimination, she was told about immunity, and knew about it, before the voting ever happened. She could do anything she wanted because she knew she was invincible. I'll agree it was tactless, but it's not a show of weakness.

    Where, exactly, does Courtney prove she needs gourmet conditions. She's covered in mud after the football drills like every other camper, wrestling in a kiddy ball pit that hasn't been cleaned ever filled with dirty diapers and small children, covered in a stink bomb, soaking in a tomato juice bath. For someone who "requires" high-class conditions, she certainly doesn't need them to still bring it in challenges.

    As for team challenges, these challenges are individual challenges. Quite literally, she hasn't shown ability for or against that statement, since the only team challenge she was in was racing the go-kart, which failed due to Justin and Owen.

    Harold has not shown he can work well under "any" circumstance: He didn't do well against the monster, he was out first by the alien, he bombed the surfing challenge, he couldn't deal with the seagulls, roping Owen was hardly a victory considering Owen could barely move, he was knocked unconscious by Gwen, manipulated by Leshawna, his ghost trap doesn't scare anyone, his "victory" during the war was by sheer luck considering he could barely see. Break down their individual contributions to the challenges, and Duncan, not Harold, is the superior camper. Harold lost many times, certainly moreso then the one victory he actually had during the submarine challenge.

    Courtney certainly has enough brains if she's won all of these challenges thus far. Ignoring the part where she manipulated Duncan, she did navigate an entire laser grid by herself.

    And as for TDI, this has been hammered into the dirt a hundred times. Breaking down the challenges proves Courtney to be the superior competitor, each and every time. Harold cost the team far worse than she ever did (Up The Creek, where he burned the canoe oars.)

    Duncan being a bully does not excuse Harold. At all. Nothing justifys cheating, particularly to someone who hasn't done anything to you.

    You must be registered and logged in to post a message.
  • Avatar of alagaesian

    alagaesian

    [320]Oct 7, 2009
    • member since: 12/17/07
    • level: 12
    • rank: Evil Bert
    • posts: 1,098
    Nothing justifies threatening to let four people fall to their deaths, either.

    As for Harold's contributions in challenges, he DID build a good sandcastle before it was attacked by seagulls, was the only person who screamed at DJ's 'scariness' in the Scream-Off, his ghost trap DID scare some people (just not Lindsay), saved everyone from drowning, was a necessary component in winning the war challenge, collected firewood for his team, managed to tie with Justin despite his obvious weapon disadvantage and the beavers coming after him, won against Lindsay in the boxing challenge, scored second place in the timed superhero race, and so forth. You can't consider him completely useless - he did contribute heavily to some of his team's victories.

    Now to drag things back on topic. My opinion stays the same - I would be all for Duncan bullying Harold, but now, Courtney is back and Duncan's pranks continue to get worse and worse. At first, he performed the instance-only type of prank, which he made up on the spot because the situation allowed it. Now he's actually planning the pranks and aggressively threatening Harold. I believe this has gone on long enough, and that they should stop as soon as possible. But, considering how much Duncan loves being a bully, I doubt that will happen anytime soon.
    You must be registered and logged in to post a message.