How many times must this be said?

Yes, Courtney did not get shot in the hunting challenge, but the goal of the game was to shoot the deer. That's how the points were taken. The deer did not get points by not getting shot. The hunters got points by shooting deer.

Harold shot deer, he earned points. So even thought Courtney did not get shot, she didn't really do anything.

In fact, she didn't even have to do anything, since Owen did not come after her. She could stand in the open, and Owen would be hunting DJ or Duncan.

Well, even with the things Harold "would" have done, the point we are trying to make is that he would do it.

He may not have done them, but he most likely wanted, and was going to do them.

So had he done his things, or in this case, if the writers had done it, he would be better than Courtney. But I suppose they wanted to make them more equal.

I never said Courtney was better. I see them as equal.

And the fact that even though Harold didn't do those things, he did want to do most of them.

So since Harold was going to do his fear in the fear challenge with his own will, and didn't give up on purpose, should show he was better than Courtney in the challenge, who choose not to do it.

I don't understand this at all, anymore. Even if Courtney lasted longer, in the long run she did not have many allies, or friends, in fact some people probably just didn't like her stuck-up, bossy attitude. And even if they thought Harold was a little weird or annoying, he is obviously much easier to get along with and be friends with.

I think in the social aspect of the game, as in alliances and friendships, Harold is far better. As for challenges, I still think Harold is better, even by just a little. Once Courtney wins a challenge on her own, then they will be equal, until then, no.

It is obvious that Harold was going to do his fear, he had nun-chucks out and everything, but it is not obvious that Courtney would get as good a score as Harold did.

How do you know if Chef would like that music, anyway?

I give up. Neji, me, and lots of people have given you good information, but you choose to deny it. You don't even think of it as possible, or even probable. I've not seen anything to make me think Courtney is better. How do you not know that the writters meant to make Harold better, anyway? This is a cartoon, after all.

You act as if you aren't stubborn as well.

Whatever. I pick LeShawna's to be more unfair.

I kind of voted Owen, because I like the guy. But the REAL reason Courtney's in the game is because Harold tampered with the votes back in "Basic Straining." Look it up. And knowing his past history with Duncan and Courtney, Harold might get himself eliminated at the right time, and reveal that HE is the key to Courtney's invincibility, and if he told everyone that he was why Courtney was eliminated, he'd get Eliminated, but then Courtney would have to fight for invincibility, just like everyone else.

As for Owen, he kind of deserved it, being in the downward spiral of Season 2. Eating Fake Food led to indigestion, and broken jaws led to constipation, and chicken scented cologne led to Chaos! He'll probably be on Aftermath III.

Maybe he meant triple the points they already had.

Look at it this way: Who would you rather be in a alliance with? Courtney or Harold?

Courtey: Yes, she does have leadership values and stuff, that is a pro, but a really big con is her attitude. She is mean, bossy, and selfish. Not to mention if you were in an alliance, or even friends with her, she'd stab you in the back very first chance she gets.

Harold: He has had his share of the limelight. He is a good player. Granted, he may not be as good a leader as Courtney, but he does try his best in the challenges. He may have cheated Courtney out of TDI, but for the most part, he wasn't a mean guy. He may have had off moments, but nowhere near as bad as Courtney did. I find him to be a better person to form an alliance with, because A) He is a good player. And B) He probably would stick with any alliance deal for as long as it stands.