We're moving Forums to the Community pages. Click here for more information and updates.

Avatar: The Last Airbender Forums

Nickelodeon (ended 2008)

Analysing Avatar: The Last Airbender

  • Avatar of tomtitan

    tomtitan

    [101]Jun 1, 2008
    • member since: 03/01/07
    • level: 19
    • rank: Fall Guy
    • posts: 10,891
    xRamensx wrote:

    tomtitan wrote:
    moskalenkoroman wrote:
    I want to talk about choice and dastiny.Studing the way of people thoughts I understand that people think that destiny is some kind of way of life.And each person cannt avoid his destiny and will face it sooner or later.In other hand we have choice people thinks that always is choice and they can controll their way of life making thertain choices.The answer is:Are we really makes choises to make our dastiny or choices are only a part of our destiny.
    Aah the old 'free will vs. destiny' debate. No matter how much the characters run they can't escape their destinies.

    I go more with destiny; I kind of have to since my religion doesn't generally believe in free will. But I think there's some part free will plays in destiny.

    I was going to say something, but my train of thought sort of hit a couch, went off track, and crashed.

    You don't have to believe in destiny because of your religion. Believe what makes more sense to you.

    I find it easier to sit on the sidelines. Both sides have good points and IMO there's no definitive answer.
    You must be registered and logged in to post a message.
  • Avatar of anony6983

    anony6983

    [102]Jun 1, 2008
    • member since: 04/20/08
    • level: 4
    • rank: Thighmaster
    • posts: 82
    tomtitan wrote:
    DeeDuck33 wrote:
    anony6983 wrote:

    ok i dont know if this has already been mentioned in this topic (too many paragraphs to skim through )

    but the first great effect that i noticed (and im picking out a specific scene here to emphasize how well thought out each shot is) was in 'the avatar returns' in book 1...near the end of the episode...aang finally relieves himself of the burden of admitting that he didn't want to be the avatar in the first place...and as soon as he says that...and dark cloud passes over him and then over katara and sokka...after the burden has passed(the dark cloud)...the sun peeks through the clouds and shines right on them as aang has finally come to terms with wat he is

    Ooh... Nice catch! So basically, sometimes the weather reflects the characters' feelings, right? In that case, I'll point towards The Storm. Notice how a fierce storm came when Aang had to admitt his feelings of hurt. It revealed an inner storm, like a metaphor.
    I wonder if the people who made the episode were actually thinking of that when they did that.

    you know sometimes i question that with novels-did the author MEAN to put a symbol there or was it just a coincidence?
    And what i think now is that a person cannot create metaphors, symbolism, puns etc etc without the knowledge of what those words mean...so when you learn that kind of stuff in school or whatever, it just sticks in your mind and without you realizing it, you create what you already know

    sometimes the stuff is done purposefully and some isnt...we'll never know which is and isnt

    (though on a side note: that dark cloud+sunshine looked purposeful because it was so random)

    Edited on 06/01/2008 1:03pm
    You must be registered and logged in to post a message.
  • Avatar of tomtitan

    tomtitan

    [103]Jun 1, 2008
    • member since: 03/01/07
    • level: 19
    • rank: Fall Guy
    • posts: 10,891
    anony6983 wrote:
    tomtitan wrote:
    DeeDuck33 wrote:
    anony6983 wrote:

    ok i dont know if this has already been mentioned in this topic (too many paragraphs to skim through )

    but the first great effect that i noticed (and im picking out a specific scene here to emphasize how well thought out each shot is) was in 'the avatar returns' in book 1...near the end of the episode...aang finally relieves himself of the burden of admitting that he didn't want to be the avatar in the first place...and as soon as he says that...and dark cloud passes over him and then over katara and sokka...after the burden has passed(the dark cloud)...the sun peeks through the clouds and shines right on them as aang has finally come to terms with wat he is

    Ooh... Nice catch! So basically, sometimes the weather reflects the characters' feelings, right? In that case, I'll point towards The Storm. Notice how a fierce storm came when Aang had to admitt his feelings of hurt. It revealed an inner storm, like a metaphor.
    I wonder if the people who made the episode were actually thinking of that when they did that.

    you know sometimes i question that with novels-did the author MEAN to put a symbol there or was it just a coincidence?
    And what i think now is that a person cannot create metaphors, symbolism, puns etc etc without the knowledge of what those words mean...so when you learn that kind of stuff in school or whatever, it just sticks in your mind and without you realizing it, you create what you already know

    sometimes the stuff is done purposefully and some isnt...we'll never know which is and isnt

    We need the creator's input. That's why DVD commentary is so useful.

    Sometimes when I think of stories I think of something, and only after I've thought of it do I see a metaphor in it. I think 'whoah, that's not what I meant, but it's cool, let's go with it'.
    You must be registered and logged in to post a message.
  • Avatar of DeeDuck33

    DeeDuck33

    [104]Jun 1, 2008
    • member since: 04/15/08
    • level: 11
    • rank: Red Shirted Lt.
    • posts: 1,198
    anony6983 wrote:
    tomtitan wrote:
    DeeDuck33 wrote:
    anony6983 wrote:

    ok i dont know if this has already been mentioned in this topic (too many paragraphs to skim through )

    but the first great effect that i noticed (and im picking out a specific scene here to emphasize how well thought out each shot is) was in 'the avatar returns' in book 1...near the end of the episode...aang finally relieves himself of the burden of admitting that he didn't want to be the avatar in the first place...and as soon as he says that...and dark cloud passes over him and then over katara and sokka...after the burden has passed(the dark cloud)...the sun peeks through the clouds and shines right on them as aang has finally come to terms with wat he is

    Ooh... Nice catch! So basically, sometimes the weather reflects the characters' feelings, right? In that case, I'll point towards The Storm. Notice how a fierce storm came when Aang had to admitt his feelings of hurt. It revealed an inner storm, like a metaphor.
    I wonder if the people who made the episode were actually thinking of that when they did that.

    you know sometimes i question that with novels-did the author MEAN to put a symbol there or was it just a coincidence?
    And what i think now is that a person cannot create metaphors, symbolism, puns etc etc without the knowledge of what those words mean...so when you learn that kind of stuff in school or whatever, it just sticks in your mind and without you realizing it, you create what you already know

    sometimes the stuff is done purposefully and some isnt...we'll never know which is and isnt


    I absolutely love shows that invoke thought. Sometimes I want to think about what I'm watching instead of looking at idiots trying to get 15 minutes of fame. Avatar is way more real than a silly show such as Flavor of Love (I fail for even knowing what that is). I'm glad I learned how to analyze fiction in English... it such a useful skill. To be able to find the deeper meaning is a job well done.

    Let's talk destiny: I'm leaning more towards "your choices were just part of your overall destiny," but I don't really know. Maybe because of the choices you made, you come closer and closer to your true destiny. But I think show wise, it speaks more about free will. But that's still in the grey area.

    My favorite part about analyzing: metaphors. Notice how storms in Avatar appear during certain times. For example, in The Awakening, a storm errupted as Aang ran off to face the Firelord. Notice how it went along with how Aang was feeling.

    Wow, my attention span has just ran up. I'll post more later.
    You must be registered and logged in to post a message.
  • Avatar of tomtitan

    tomtitan

    [105]Jun 1, 2008
    • member since: 03/01/07
    • level: 19
    • rank: Fall Guy
    • posts: 10,891
    DeeDuck33 wrote:
    anony6983 wrote:
    tomtitan wrote:
    DeeDuck33 wrote:
    anony6983 wrote:

    ok i dont know if this has already been mentioned in this topic (too many paragraphs to skim through )

    but the first great effect that i noticed (and im picking out a specific scene here to emphasize how well thought out each shot is) was in 'the avatar returns' in book 1...near the end of the episode...aang finally relieves himself of the burden of admitting that he didn't want to be the avatar in the first place...and as soon as he says that...and dark cloud passes over him and then over katara and sokka...after the burden has passed(the dark cloud)...the sun peeks through the clouds and shines right on them as aang has finally come to terms with wat he is

    Ooh... Nice catch! So basically, sometimes the weather reflects the characters' feelings, right? In that case, I'll point towards The Storm. Notice how a fierce storm came when Aang had to admitt his feelings of hurt. It revealed an inner storm, like a metaphor.
    I wonder if the people who made the episode were actually thinking of that when they did that.

    you know sometimes i question that with novels-did the author MEAN to put a symbol there or was it just a coincidence?
    And what i think now is that a person cannot create metaphors, symbolism, puns etc etc without the knowledge of what those words mean...so when you learn that kind of stuff in school or whatever, it just sticks in your mind and without you realizing it, you create what you already know

    sometimes the stuff is done purposefully and some isnt...we'll never know which is and isnt


    I absolutely love shows that invoke thought. Sometimes I want to think about what I'm watching instead of looking at idiots trying to get 15 minutes of fame. Avatar is way more real than a silly show such as Flavor of Love (I fail for even knowing what that is). I'm glad I learned how to analyze fiction in English... it such a useful skill. To be able to find the deeper meaning is a job well done.

    Let's talk destiny: I'm leaning more towards "your choices were just part of your overall destiny," but I don't really know. Maybe because of the choices you made, you come closer and closer to your true destiny. But I think show wise, it speaks more about free will. But that's still in the grey area.

    My favorite part about analyzing: metaphors. Notice how storms in Avatar appear during certain times. For example, in The Awakening, a storm errupted as Aang ran off to face the Firelord. Notice how it went along with how Aang was feeling.

    Wow, my attention span has just ran up. I'll post more later.
    I think we have to be very careful when analysing literature, because sometimes we look for things that aren't really there. We don't know how many of these so-called metaphors the writers, creators, animators etc. actually intended. With some works of fiction the entire thing is metaphor, Lord of the Flies, for example. With others, some of it is metaphor, Of Mice And Men, for example. With most, none is metaphor, Spongebob, for example. With others, there are a couple of metaphors to keep smart people on their toes, but other than that not much, Avatar, for example.
    You must be registered and logged in to post a message.
  • Avatar of DeeDuck33

    DeeDuck33

    [106]Jun 1, 2008
    • member since: 04/15/08
    • level: 11
    • rank: Red Shirted Lt.
    • posts: 1,198
    tomtitan wrote:
    DeeDuck33 wrote:
    anony6983 wrote:
    tomtitan wrote:
    DeeDuck33 wrote:
    anony6983 wrote:

    ok i dont know if this has already been mentioned in this topic (too many paragraphs to skim through )

    but the first great effect that i noticed (and im picking out a specific scene here to emphasize how well thought out each shot is) was in 'the avatar returns' in book 1...near the end of the episode...aang finally relieves himself of the burden of admitting that he didn't want to be the avatar in the first place...and as soon as he says that...and dark cloud passes over him and then over katara and sokka...after the burden has passed(the dark cloud)...the sun peeks through the clouds and shines right on them as aang has finally come to terms with wat he is

    Ooh... Nice catch! So basically, sometimes the weather reflects the characters' feelings, right? In that case, I'll point towards The Storm. Notice how a fierce storm came when Aang had to admitt his feelings of hurt. It revealed an inner storm, like a metaphor.
    I wonder if the people who made the episode were actually thinking of that when they did that.

    you know sometimes i question that with novels-did the author MEAN to put a symbol there or was it just a coincidence?
    And what i think now is that a person cannot create metaphors, symbolism, puns etc etc without the knowledge of what those words mean...so when you learn that kind of stuff in school or whatever, it just sticks in your mind and without you realizing it, you create what you already know

    sometimes the stuff is done purposefully and some isnt...we'll never know which is and isnt


    I absolutely love shows that invoke thought. Sometimes I want to think about what I'm watching instead of looking at idiots trying to get 15 minutes of fame. Avatar is way more real than a silly show such as Flavor of Love (I fail for even knowing what that is). I'm glad I learned how to analyze fiction in English... it such a useful skill. To be able to find the deeper meaning is a job well done.

    Let's talk destiny: I'm leaning more towards "your choices were just part of your overall destiny," but I don't really know. Maybe because of the choices you made, you come closer and closer to your true destiny. But I think show wise, it speaks more about free will. But that's still in the grey area.

    My favorite part about analyzing: metaphors. Notice how storms in Avatar appear during certain times. For example, in The Awakening, a storm errupted as Aang ran off to face the Firelord. Notice how it went along with how Aang was feeling.

    Wow, my attention span has just ran up. I'll post more later.
    I think we have to be very careful when analysing literature, because sometimes we look for things that aren't really there. We don't know how many of these so-called metaphors the writers, creators, animators etc. actually intended. With some works of fiction the entire thing is metaphor, Lord of the Flies, for example. With others, some of it is metaphor, Of Mice And Men, for example. With most, none is metaphor, Spongebob, for example. With others, there are a couple of metaphors to keep smart people on their toes, but other than that not much, Avatar, for example.

    Yeah... I tend to over-do things at times. ^_^()
    You must be registered and logged in to post a message.
  • Avatar of avatar44vb

    avatar44vb

    [107]Jun 1, 2008
    • member since: 07/15/06
    • level: 3
    • rank: Soup Nazi
    • posts: 41

    Metaphors... that's a good topic. I think we've talked enough about the free will versus destiny and even the destiny and fate as a theme in the series. Can we talk about allusions? Avatar has lots of allusions it takes from real life. Most people who don't watch the show think it's strictly based on Asian influences, but there can be allusions found that relate to other parts of the world, past or present. (I can't think of any right now, but I know there are some.)

    You must be registered and logged in to post a message.
  • Avatar of xRamensx

    xRamensx

    [108]Jun 1, 2008
    • member since: 03/01/08
    • level: 11
    • rank: Red Shirted Lt.
    • posts: 2,541
    tomtitan wrote:
    xRamensx wrote:

    tomtitan wrote:
    moskalenkoroman wrote:
    I want to talk about choice and dastiny.Studing the way of people thoughts I understand that people think that destiny is some kind of way of life.And each person cannt avoid his destiny and will face it sooner or later.In other hand we have choice people thinks that always is choice and they can controll their way of life making thertain choices.The answer is:Are we really makes choises to make our dastiny or choices are only a part of our destiny.
    Aah the old 'free will vs. destiny' debate. No matter how much the characters run they can't escape their destinies.

    I go more with destiny; I kind of have to since my religion doesn't generally believe in free will. But I think there's some part free will plays in destiny.

    I was going to say something, but my train of thought sort of hit a couch, went off track, and crashed.

    You don't have to believe in destiny because of your religion. Believe what makes more sense to you. I find it easier to sit on the sidelines. Both sides have good points and IMO there's no definitive answer.

    I don't believe in it just because of my religion; I have some inkling of a belief in free will. But I just don't focus on it that much.

    You must be registered and logged in to post a message.
  • Avatar of yogi_tulsii

    yogi_tulsii

    [109]Jun 2, 2008
    • member since: 08/14/06
    • level: 6
    • rank: Small Wonder
    • posts: 500
    I think that we do have free wil, but our decisions are already know, so our destiny comes about fromm our free will.
    You must be registered and logged in to post a message.
  • Avatar of xRamensx

    xRamensx

    [110]Jun 6, 2008
    • member since: 03/01/08
    • level: 11
    • rank: Red Shirted Lt.
    • posts: 2,541

    I've said several times that Azula interests me very much, but so does the whole Fire Nation family. I'm going to analyze stuff, but doesn't mean I'm trying to put things in that aren't there. These are merely observations that I've gotten from the show and theories based off of them.

    We know that in the family, Sozin, from Ozai's family, is supposed to be the "evil" side, and Roku, from Ursa's family, is supposed to be the "good" side. So in theory, that would make any offspring of Sozin's inherently evil, and Roku's pure. But what does that make Iroh? He has the same genetic background of Ozai, and yet, he made completely different life choices than he younger brother.

    What could have made Iroh like that? I think he's a clear indication that you shouldn't take the genetic "good" and "evil" seriously, but he just used that as example that it might give Zuko a clue as to why he has struggled with his own decisions. I don't think anybody is born evil; it's your upbringing and how your mind reacts to that upbringing. Iroh's mind said 'I don't have to always have to do what my family has done.' The fact that Iroh might have been a prodigy, but wasn't power hungry, he had a different reaction than say, Azula, did.

    Azula is also an example that you shouldn't take what Iroh said about Sozin and Roku literally. She has the same genetic background as Zuko, and she has made different decisions, and none of them good.

    Ozai might have not been born naturally good at Fire Bending. Or, he could have been a prodigy as well, but since he was second born, Azulon paid Iroh a lot more attention. Let's look at this if Ozai wasn't a naturally good. The fact that Ozai was already born second, and he didn't meet the expectations Azulon already had for Iroh, he was pretty much screwed. So he had to work hard, and try to earn the love his father didn't return to him. Sound familiar?

    Azulon probably saw that Ozai had to work so hard to even come close to Iroh, and rejected him for that. As Azula said in CoD "But true power, the divine right to rule, is something you're born with." Points away from Ozai's favor if he was, in fact, not a naturally gifted.

    But like I said, we don't know how strong Ozai was in the beginning. From what we've seen in the show. Ozai hasn't seemed to make his own desisions that much. When Azulon told him to kill Zuko, Ozai said he was going to do it. Sure Ozai could have come up with a better option. But in his mind, if he did this, he'd get what he'd want, and didn't even consider the consequences. Ursa was the one to talk him out of it. She came up with another option, and he listened.

    If there is one thing Ozai isn't, then that would genre savvy. He was completely surprised that Aang was still alive. He never thought that Azula could lie to him, even though he knows full well how clever she is. Zuko was orginally was like this early on too, but gradually, he has gotten better. We know that Azula is genre savvy incarnate. But what about Ursa? We've haven't seen enough of her to make a completel observation, but Azula must have gotten it from somewhere.

    The show has shown us that our decisions play a huge part in our lives. Everyone is capable good and evil, but how we make our decisions is what separates us. Does that mean once someone makes a decision, you can't come back from that? Of course not! Look at Zuko; he spent all of S1 chasing Aang, spent S2 running from Azula, and sometimes going after Aang if they crossed paths, at the end of S2, he has the perfect opportunity to change sides, and, didn't. Then, in S3, he realized that pleasing his father wasn't what he wanted anymore. He figured out his own life purpose, but it took 16/17 years for him to realize what it was.

    Does that mean Ozai would want to change sides? Probably not. Why would he? He has all this power and rules the Fire Nation and controls the Earth Kingdom.

    Sorry I jumped around a bit; I was having trouble organizing my thoughts. But, as I said in the beginning, these are just theories; I'm not trying to analyze things that might not even be there.

    You must be registered and logged in to post a message.
  • Avatar of MaddoKos

    MaddoKos

    [111]Jun 6, 2008
    • member since: 05/19/08
    • level: 10
    • rank: Holy Level 10!
    • posts: 2,459

    tomtitan wrote:
    I think we have to be very careful when analysing literature, because sometimes we look for things that aren't really there. We don't know how many of these so-called metaphors the writers, creators, animators etc. actually intended. With some works of fiction the entire thing is metaphor, Lord of the Flies, for example. With others, some of it is metaphor, Of Mice And Men, for example. With most, none is metaphor, Spongebob, for example. With others, there are a couple of metaphors to keep smart people on their toes, but other than that not much, Avatar, for example.

    I take it you're an Intetionalist critic. That is: you try to figure out exactly what the author of a story intended. But there is another line of thought, "Reader response" criticism that holds that a reader's (or viewer's) interpretations are valid regardless of what the author intended.

    xRamensx wrote:
    We know that Azula is genre savvy incarnate. But what about Ursa? We've haven't seen enough of her to make a completel observation...

    Maybe, but anyone logistically capable of killing Azulon (however she did it) is pretty damn savvy in my book.

    Edited on 06/06/2008 4:33pm
    Edited 2 total times.
    You must be registered and logged in to post a message.
  • Avatar of xRamensx

    xRamensx

    [112]Jun 6, 2008
    • member since: 03/01/08
    • level: 11
    • rank: Red Shirted Lt.
    • posts: 2,541

    [QUOTE="MaddoKos"]

    tomtitan wrote:
    I think we have to be very careful when analysing literature, because sometimes we look for things that aren't really there. We don't know how many of these so-called metaphors the writers, creators, animators etc. actually intended. With some works of fiction the entire thing is metaphor, Lord of the Flies, for example. With others, some of it is metaphor, Of Mice And Men, for example. With most, none is metaphor, Spongebob, for example. With others, there are a couple of metaphors to keep smart people on their toes, but other than that not much, Avatar, for example.
    I take it your an Intetionalist critic. That is: you try to figure out exactly what the author of a story intended. But there is another line of thought, "Reader response" criticism that holds that a reader's (or viewer's) interpretations are valid regardless of what the author intended.
    xRamensx wrote:
    We know that Azula is genre savvy incarnate. But what about Ursa? We've haven't seen enough of her to make a completel observation...QUOTE] Maybe, but anyone logistically capable of killing Azulon(however she did it) is pretty damn savvy in my book.

    Yeah. I think she's genre savvy, but I had already made a bunch of assumptions, I didn't want to make too many.

    In my eyes, Ursa and Azula are pretty bad*ss. No.. Not pretty. Very.

    You must be registered and logged in to post a message.
  • Avatar of Vxiel

    Vxiel

    [113]Jun 6, 2008
    • member since: 06/05/08
    • level: 6
    • rank: Small Wonder
    • posts: 616
    [QUOTE="xRamensx"]

    MaddoKos wrote:
    tomtitan wrote:
    I think we have to be very careful when analysing literature, because sometimes we look for things that aren't really there. We don't know how many of these so-called metaphors the writers, creators, animators etc. actually intended. With some works of fiction the entire thing is metaphor, Lord of the Flies, for example. With others, some of it is metaphor, Of Mice And Men, for example. With most, none is metaphor, Spongebob, for example. With others, there are a couple of metaphors to keep smart people on their toes, but other than that not much, Avatar, for example.
    I take it your an Intetionalist critic. That is: you try to figure out exactly what the author of a story intended. But there is another line of thought, "Reader response" criticism that holds that a reader's (or viewer's) interpretations are valid regardless of what the author intended.
    xRamensx wrote:
    We know that Azula is genre savvy incarnate. But what about Ursa? We've haven't seen enough of her to make a completel observation...QUOTE] Maybe, but anyone logistically capable of killing Azulon(however she did it) is pretty damn savvy in my book.

    Yeah. I think she's genre savvy, but I had already made a bunch of assumptions, I didn't want to make too many.

    In my eyes, Ursa and Azula are pretty bad*ss. No.. Not pretty. Very.

    Those ideas could swing back and forth

    Edited on 06/06/2008 4:39pm
    You must be registered and logged in to post a message.
  • Avatar of xRamensx

    xRamensx

    [114]Jun 6, 2008
    • member since: 03/01/08
    • level: 11
    • rank: Red Shirted Lt.
    • posts: 2,541
    [QUOTE="Vxiel"]
    xRamensx wrote:

    MaddoKos wrote:
    tomtitan wrote:
    I think we have to be very careful when analysing literature, because sometimes we look for things that aren't really there. We don't know how many of these so-called metaphors the writers, creators, animators etc. actually intended. With some works of fiction the entire thing is metaphor, Lord of the Flies, for example. With others, some of it is metaphor, Of Mice And Men, for example. With most, none is metaphor, Spongebob, for example. With others, there are a couple of metaphors to keep smart people on their toes, but other than that not much, Avatar, for example.
    I take it your an Intetionalist critic. That is: you try to figure out exactly what the author of a story intended. But there is another line of thought, "Reader response" criticism that holds that a reader's (or viewer's) interpretations are valid regardless of what the author intended.
    xRamensx wrote:
    We know that Azula is genre savvy incarnate. But what about Ursa? We've haven't seen enough of her to make a completel observation...QUOTE] Maybe, but anyone logistically capable of killing Azulon(however she did it) is pretty damn savvy in my book.

    Yeah. I think she's genre savvy, but I had already made a bunch of assumptions, I didn't want to make too many.

    In my eyes, Ursa and Azula are pretty bad*ss. No.. Not pretty. Very.

    Those ideas could swing back and forth

    What do you mean by that?

    You must be registered and logged in to post a message.
  • Avatar of MaddoKos

    MaddoKos

    [115]Jun 6, 2008
    • member since: 05/19/08
    • level: 10
    • rank: Holy Level 10!
    • posts: 2,459
    xRamensx wrote:

    MaddoKos wrote:
    tomtitan wrote:
    I think we have to be very careful when analysing literature, because sometimes we look for things that aren't really there. We don't know how many of these so-called metaphors the writers, creators, animators etc. actually intended. With some works of fiction the entire thing is metaphor, Lord of the Flies, for example. With others, some of it is metaphor, Of Mice And Men, for example. With most, none is metaphor, Spongebob, for example. With others, there are a couple of metaphors to keep smart people on their toes, but other than that not much, Avatar, for example.
    I take it your an Intetionalist critic. That is: you try to figure out exactly what the author of a story intended. But there is another line of thought, "Reader response" criticism that holds that a reader's (or viewer's) interpretations are valid regardless of what the author intended.
    xRamensx wrote:
    We know that Azula is genre savvy incarnate. But what about Ursa? We've haven't seen enough of her to make a completel observation...QUOTE] Maybe, but anyone logistically capable of killing Azulon(however she did it) is pretty damn savvy in my book.

    Yeah. I think she's genre savvy, but I had already made a bunch of assumptions, I didn't want to make too many.

    In my eyes, Ursa and Azula are pretty bad*ss. No.. Not pretty. Very.

    But their attitudes are, of course, totally different. Ursa only did what she did to save Zuko.

    Azula, meanwhile, has a kind of Lady MacBeth thing going on.

    Edited on 06/06/2008 4:43pm
    Edited 2 total times.
    You must be registered and logged in to post a message.
  • Avatar of Vxiel

    Vxiel

    [116]Jun 6, 2008
    • member since: 06/05/08
    • level: 6
    • rank: Small Wonder
    • posts: 616
    [QUOTE="xRamensx"]
    Vxiel wrote:
    xRamensx wrote:

    MaddoKos wrote:
    tomtitan wrote:
    I think we have to be very careful when analysing literature, because sometimes we look for things that aren't really there. We don't know how many of these so-called metaphors the writers, creators, animators etc. actually intended. With some works of fiction the entire thing is metaphor, Lord of the Flies, for example. With others, some of it is metaphor, Of Mice And Men, for example. With most, none is metaphor, Spongebob, for example. With others, there are a couple of metaphors to keep smart people on their toes, but other than that not much, Avatar, for example.
    I take it your an Intetionalist critic. That is: you try to figure out exactly what the author of a story intended. But there is another line of thought, "Reader response" criticism that holds that a reader's (or viewer's) interpretations are valid regardless of what the author intended.
    xRamensx wrote:
    We know that Azula is genre savvy incarnate. But what about Ursa? We've haven't seen enough of her to make a completel observation...QUOTE] Maybe, but anyone logistically capable of killing Azulon(however she did it) is pretty damn savvy in my book.

    Yeah. I think she's genre savvy, but I had already made a bunch of assumptions, I didn't want to make too many.

    In my eyes, Ursa and Azula are pretty bad*ss. No.. Not pretty. Very.

    Those ideas could swing back and forth

    What do you mean by that?

    Meaning one of them is probably true to some while the latter to others (I really don't think I know what I'm talking about here)

    You must be registered and logged in to post a message.
  • Avatar of MaddoKos

    MaddoKos

    [117]Jun 6, 2008
    • member since: 05/19/08
    • level: 10
    • rank: Holy Level 10!
    • posts: 2,459
    Vxiel wrote:
    xRamensx wrote:

    MaddoKos wrote:
    tomtitan wrote:
    I think we have to be very careful when analysing literature, because sometimes we look for things that aren't really there. We don't know how many of these so-called metaphors the writers, creators, animators etc. actually intended. With some works of fiction the entire thing is metaphor, Lord of the Flies, for example. With others, some of it is metaphor, Of Mice And Men, for example. With most, none is metaphor, Spongebob, for example. With others, there are a couple of metaphors to keep smart people on their toes, but other than that not much, Avatar, for example.
    I take it your an Intetionalist critic. That is: you try to figure out exactly what the author of a story intended. But there is another line of thought, "Reader response" criticism that holds that a reader's (or viewer's) interpretations are valid regardless of what the author intended.
    xRamensx wrote:
    We know that Azula is genre savvy incarnate. But what about Ursa? We've haven't seen enough of her to make a completel observation...QUOTE] Maybe, but anyone logistically capable of killing Azulon(however she did it) is pretty damn savvy in my book.

    Yeah. I think she's genre savvy, but I had already made a bunch of assumptions, I didn't want to make too many.

    In my eyes, Ursa and Azula are pretty bad*ss. No.. Not pretty. Very.

    Those ideas could swing back and forth

    That's true, generally I try to employ both when reading or watching something. But I'm more partial to intentionlist.

    Edited on 06/06/2008 4:48pm
    You must be registered and logged in to post a message.
  • Avatar of xRamensx

    xRamensx

    [118]Jun 6, 2008
    • member since: 03/01/08
    • level: 11
    • rank: Red Shirted Lt.
    • posts: 2,541
    [QUOTE="MaddoKos"]
    xRamensx wrote:

    MaddoKos wrote:
    tomtitan wrote:
    I think we have to be very careful when analysing literature, because sometimes we look for things that aren't really there. We don't know how many of these so-called metaphors the writers, creators, animators etc. actually intended. With some works of fiction the entire thing is metaphor, Lord of the Flies, for example. With others, some of it is metaphor, Of Mice And Men, for example. With most, none is metaphor, Spongebob, for example. With others, there are a couple of metaphors to keep smart people on their toes, but other than that not much, Avatar, for example.
    I take it your an Intetionalist critic. That is: you try to figure out exactly what the author of a story intended. But there is another line of thought, "Reader response" criticism that holds that a reader's (or viewer's) interpretations are valid regardless of what the author intended.
    xRamensx wrote:
    We know that Azula is genre savvy incarnate. But what about Ursa? We've haven't seen enough of her to make a completel observation...QUOTE] Maybe, but anyone logistically capable of killing Azulon(however she did it) is pretty damn savvy in my book.

    Yeah. I think she's genre savvy, but I had already made a bunch of assumptions, I didn't want to make too many.

    In my eyes, Ursa and Azula are pretty bad*ss. No.. Not pretty. Very.

    But their attitudes are, of course, totally different. Ursa was only did what she did to save Zuko. Azula, meanwhile, has a kind of Lady MacBeth thing going on.

    But Ursa did what she did to protect what she loves.

    Azula does what she does, yes probably for the sheer enjoyment, but also, I think she does it to protect her father. She sort of uses her status to hide a little bit. If she had been of low birth, and still acted like she does now, who knows what would have happened to her.

    But yes, they're overall attitudes are fairly different. But for some reason, I don't see them as completely different. They fight for what is important to them. Azula doesn't actually fight if she doesn't have to. She doesn't rush head-on into a fight, she figures out what what needs to be done and how much force she has to use. If Ursa actually did kill Azulon, then she had been seen (frim what we saw) as an obedient woman who only spoke out if she had to. If Zuko's life, her son's life, was threatened. Then she's going to bite back at whatever the threat is.

    You must be registered and logged in to post a message.
  • Avatar of MaddoKos

    MaddoKos

    [119]Jun 6, 2008
    • member since: 05/19/08
    • level: 10
    • rank: Holy Level 10!
    • posts: 2,459
    [QUOTE="xRamensx"]
    MaddoKos wrote:
    xRamensx wrote:

    MaddoKos wrote:
    tomtitan wrote:
    I think we have to be very careful when analysing literature, because sometimes we look for things that aren't really there. We don't know how many of these so-called metaphors the writers, creators, animators etc. actually intended. With some works of fiction the entire thing is metaphor, Lord of the Flies, for example. With others, some of it is metaphor, Of Mice And Men, for example. With most, none is metaphor, Spongebob, for example. With others, there are a couple of metaphors to keep smart people on their toes, but other than that not much, Avatar, for example.
    I take it your an Intetionalist critic. That is: you try to figure out exactly what the author of a story intended. But there is another line of thought, "Reader response" criticism that holds that a reader's (or viewer's) interpretations are valid regardless of what the author intended.
    xRamensx wrote:
    We know that Azula is genre savvy incarnate. But what about Ursa? We've haven't seen enough of her to make a completel observation...QUOTE] Maybe, but anyone logistically capable of killing Azulon(however she did it) is pretty damn savvy in my book.

    Yeah. I think she's genre savvy, but I had already made a bunch of assumptions, I didn't want to make too many.

    In my eyes, Ursa and Azula are pretty bad*ss. No.. Not pretty. Very.

    But their attitudes are, of course, totally different. Ursa was only did what she did to save Zuko. Azula, meanwhile, has a kind of Lady MacBeth thing going on.

    But Ursa did what she did to protect what she loves.

    Azula does what she does, yes probably for the sheer enjoyment, but also, I think she does it to protect her father. She sort of uses her status to hide a little bit. If she had been of low birth, and still acted like she does now, who knows what would have happened to her.

    But yes, they're overall attitudes are fairly different. But for some reason, I don't see them as completely different. They fight for what is important to them. Azula doesn't actually fight if she doesn't have to. She doesn't rush head-on into a fight, she figures out what what needs to be done and how much force she has to use. If Ursa actually did kill Azulon, then she had been seen (frim what we saw) as an obedient woman who only spoke out if she had to. If Zuko's life, her son's life, was threatened. Then she's going to bite back at whatever the threat is.



    I don't know. I feel like everything Azula does is for Azula.

    After all, as you pointed out, she lied to Ozai, giving Zuko the credit of killing the Avatar in order to set him up as the fall guy in the event Aang survived. Not the hallmarks of an entirely faithful servent of the crown if you ask me.
    You must be registered and logged in to post a message.
  • Avatar of xRamensx

    xRamensx

    [120]Jun 6, 2008
    • member since: 03/01/08
    • level: 11
    • rank: Red Shirted Lt.
    • posts: 2,541
    [QUOTE="MaddoKos"]
    xRamensx wrote:
    MaddoKos wrote:
    xRamensx wrote:

    MaddoKos wrote:
    tomtitan wrote:
    I think we have to be very careful when analysing literature, because sometimes we look for things that aren't really there. We don't know how many of these so-called metaphors the writers, creators, animators etc. actually intended. With some works of fiction the entire thing is metaphor, Lord of the Flies, for example. With others, some of it is metaphor, Of Mice And Men, for example. With most, none is metaphor, Spongebob, for example. With others, there are a couple of metaphors to keep smart people on their toes, but other than that not much, Avatar, for example.
    I take it your an Intetionalist critic. That is: you try to figure out exactly what the author of a story intended. But there is another line of thought, "Reader response" criticism that holds that a reader's (or viewer's) interpretations are valid regardless of what the author intended.
    xRamensx wrote:
    We know that Azula is genre savvy incarnate. But what about Ursa? We've haven't seen enough of her to make a completel observation...QUOTE] Maybe, but anyone logistically capable of killing Azulon(however she did it) is pretty damn savvy in my book.

    Yeah. I think she's genre savvy, but I had already made a bunch of assumptions, I didn't want to make too many.

    In my eyes, Ursa and Azula are pretty bad*ss. No.. Not pretty. Very.

    But their attitudes are, of course, totally different. Ursa was only did what she did to save Zuko. Azula, meanwhile, has a kind of Lady MacBeth thing going on.

    But Ursa did what she did to protect what she loves.

    Azula does what she does, yes probably for the sheer enjoyment, but also, I think she does it to protect her father. She sort of uses her status to hide a little bit. If she had been of low birth, and still acted like she does now, who knows what would have happened to her.

    But yes, they're overall attitudes are fairly different. But for some reason, I don't see them as completely different. They fight for what is important to them. Azula doesn't actually fight if she doesn't have to. She doesn't rush head-on into a fight, she figures out what what needs to be done and how much force she has to use. If Ursa actually did kill Azulon, then she had been seen (frim what we saw) as an obedient woman who only spoke out if she had to. If Zuko's life, her son's life, was threatened. Then she's going to bite back at whatever the threat is.

    I don't know. I feel like everything Azula does is for Azula. After all, as you pointed out, she lied to Ozai, giving Zuko the credit of killing the Avatar in order to set him up as the fall guy in the event Aang survived. Not the hallmarks of an entirely faithful servent of the crown if you ask me.

    True. Then you can look at it as Azula doing it to protect who she loved; herself.

    But have you noticed that Azula's ways of messing with people depends completely who it is? If it's the Gaang, it's sadistic, if it's Zuko, it's mean, and sometimes pretty cruel, but in "The Beach" when she stepped on and kicked that sandcastle, that was pretty childish. Granted it was a child she was messing with, but I think it's funny how it changes on the situation.

    Azula: Filled with awesome and lulz at the same time.

    You must be registered and logged in to post a message.