We're moving Forums to the Community pages. Click here for more information and updates.

Avatar: The Last Airbender Forums

Nickelodeon (ended 2008)

Aang Ain't White?

  • Avatar of _Flutterlight_

    _Flutterlight_

    [81]Jan 4, 2009
    • member since: 08/29/08
    • level: 15
    • rank: Ginsu Knife
    • posts: 1,393
    ranger8060 wrote:
    wow..so much controversy


    Yeah... But you know what? Arguing over the nationality of a cartoon is stupid.

    I say we all move on with life and let this thread die. Who's with me?
    You must be registered and logged in to post a message.
  • Avatar of Chesis

    Chesis

    [82]Jan 5, 2009
    • member since: 09/29/06
    • level: 2
    • rank: Sweat Hog
    • posts: 29

    _Flutterlight_ wrote:
    The Fire Nation is based off of Japan, right? Well, back before Japan's industrial revolution, arranged marriges were the standard- especially for royalty.

    They're obviously not *really* Japanese, or they would have called them Japanese, but they're definitely *based on* the Japanese and Chinese cultures because every last one the Fire Nation's most defining characteristics came from Japan or China.

    To ignore that because it's not a perfect match is just seeing what you want to see instead of what's actually there. You just pick out the real-world rules you want to apply here, like the eye color thing that I've already explained follows a *completely different* model in the Avatar world, but you keep ignoring the big, blatant, obvious cultural indicators that say THIS WORLD IS NOT WHITE.

    If you can't see that the Avatar world is Asian, I'm sorry, but you didn't understand the show at all. I'll ask you again. If you take out everything Asian and Inuit from Avatar, all the clothes, names, martial arts, philosophy, mythology, architecture, weapons, writing, mannerisms, language, and the fundamental anime-inspired *art style* of the show, what's left?

    No one is saying the entire cast has to be Asian in the movie, but if you're going to use all of this Asian and Inuit stuff in it, there had better be some decent representation of the people who actually belong in those cultures. Or else it's called cultural appropriation, and that is a bad, bad, thing.

    Edited on 01/05/2009 12:38am
    Edited 2 total times.
    You must be registered and logged in to post a message.
  • Avatar of Falcondude123

    Falcondude123

    [83]Jan 5, 2009
    • member since: 09/24/06
    • level: 10
    • rank: Holy Level 10!
    • posts: 2,602
    ThisCrazyGuy wrote:
    Falcondude123 wrote:
    ThisCrazyGuy wrote:

    This pretty much combats everything against the "Aang Ain't White" protests: http://glockgal.livejournal.com/375625.html?page=3#comments

    I personally couldn't agree more with it. This person also talks about Hollywood-racism in general, and how The Last Airbender had the opportunity to be one of the few movies around, that sticks to it's ORIGINAL theme and roots (no matter Hollywood's commandments), and showcases an Asian (Eastern) theme and influence.

    Okay so I went to the link and was sooo angered by it that I made my own profile just so I could post a lengthy rebuttal. Since the link is already in this quote^, I suggest you go to it and carefully read my response, which I had to break up over three consecutive posts.

    I'm the one posting under "FastestFalcon" on it just so you know.

    Tell me what you think.

    I can see what you are saying, and you BOTH bring up great points. I look forward to seeing what her reply will be.


    She replied, and I replied back. I'll give her this much: she is pretty civil about what she argues, despite being over-devoted to a silly cause.
    You must be registered and logged in to post a message.
  • Avatar of ThisCrazyGuy

    ThisCrazyGuy

    [84]Jan 5, 2009
    • member since: 08/10/08
    • level: 8
    • rank: Super-Friend
    • posts: 700

    _Flutterlight_ wrote:
    ThisCrazyGuy wrote:
    _Flutterlight_ wrote:
    And there ARE pleanty of things in Avatar that are not Asian or Inuit.
    Not really, not if you don't nitpick to the max, and look at the big things... All the MAJOR things are Asian-influenced...
    But "looking at the big things" is generalizing, and ignoring a minority. Isn't that what the whole "Aang ain't white" is against? You know what? I CAN say that blue eyes makes the ENTIRE water tribe white, because the inuits didn't GET the genetic mutation for blue eyes. White people did. The "well, eye color is standard between the four nations" argumant is wrong, because that shows how Avatar is AGAIN, not entirely Asian, which was my only point to being with. Avatar is a melting pot which is not controlled by any one set of guidlines or rules, so the movie should not be held to any. What's important is the actors look like their characters and act like their characters. Not where they came from.

    And you REALLY think the actors look their parts? Like seriously, you see a resemblance in Jesse McCartney and Zuko?

    I am talking about the smallest of things, and the most unimportant... You can't take a bird that isn't based and created off of Asian influence, and say that the Avatar world is dominantly Asian-based... Yeah, sure, we might run into a few Australian influences once in a while, but what do you call the influence on 99% of the Avatar world? I am a Mixed-Race person with BLUE eyes, and I have met MANY people who are the same, and so I think it is fairly common to be a tanned person (like, really tanned) with blue or green eyes, White people are not the only people that have them...

    You must be registered and logged in to post a message.
  • Avatar of ThisCrazyGuy

    ThisCrazyGuy

    [85]Jan 5, 2009
    • member since: 08/10/08
    • level: 8
    • rank: Super-Friend
    • posts: 700
    Falcondude123 wrote:
    ThisCrazyGuy wrote:
    Falcondude123 wrote:
    ThisCrazyGuy wrote:

    This pretty much combats everything against the "Aang Ain't White" protests: http://glockgal.livejournal.com/375625.html?page=3#comments

    I personally couldn't agree more with it. This person also talks about Hollywood-racism in general, and how The Last Airbender had the opportunity to be one of the few movies around, that sticks to it's ORIGINAL theme and roots (no matter Hollywood's commandments), and showcases an Asian (Eastern) theme and influence.

    Okay so I went to the link and was sooo angered by it that I made my own profile just so I could post a lengthy rebuttal. Since the link is already in this quote^, I suggest you go to it and carefully read my response, which I had to break up over three consecutive posts.

    I'm the one posting under "FastestFalcon" on it just so you know.

    Tell me what you think.

    I can see what you are saying, and you BOTH bring up great points. I look forward to seeing what her reply will be.


    She replied, and I replied back. I'll give her this much: she is pretty civil about what she argues, despite being over-devoted to a silly cause.
    I don't think it is completely respectful to call it a "silly cause"... Some people are actually quite offended by this...
    You must be registered and logged in to post a message.
  • Avatar of _Flutterlight_

    _Flutterlight_

    [86]Jan 5, 2009
    • member since: 08/29/08
    • level: 15
    • rank: Ginsu Knife
    • posts: 1,393
    ThisCrazyGuy wrote:

    _Flutterlight_ wrote:
    ThisCrazyGuy wrote:
    _Flutterlight_ wrote:
    And there ARE pleanty of things in Avatar that are not Asian or Inuit.
    Not really, not if you don't nitpick to the max, and look at the big things... All the MAJOR things are Asian-influenced...
    But "looking at the big things" is generalizing, and ignoring a minority. Isn't that what the whole "Aang ain't white" is against? You know what? I CAN say that blue eyes makes the ENTIRE water tribe white, because the inuits didn't GET the genetic mutation for blue eyes. White people did. The "well, eye color is standard between the four nations" argumant is wrong, because that shows how Avatar is AGAIN, not entirely Asian, which was my only point to being with. Avatar is a melting pot which is not controlled by any one set of guidlines or rules, so the movie should not be held to any. What's important is the actors look like their characters and act like their characters. Not where they came from.

    And you REALLY think the actors look their parts? Like seriously, you see a resemblance in Jesse McCartney and Zuko?

    I am talking about the smallest of things, and the most unimportant... You can't take a bird that isn't based and created off of Asian influence, and say that the Avatar world is dominantly Asian-based... Yeah, sure, we might run into a few Australian influences once in a while, but what do you call the influence on 99% of the Avatar world? I am a Mixed-Race person with BLUE eyes, and I have met MANY people who are the same, and so I think it is fairly common to be a tanned person (like, really tanned) with blue or green eyes, White people are not the only people that have them...



    When I said Inuits, I meant 100% inuits. But after a small debate over wether I'd get blasted for that, I deleted it. I would also like to add that white people can be tanned too, especially if they live in a place where they get lots of sun.

    And I already agreed with you: Jessie McCarteny is a HORRIBLE choice for Zuko's actor. I only said I WOULD be happy if the cast looked and acted like their characters. I never said I actually was happy with them.

    My point was that while Avatar may be 50% Asian based, the other 50% comes from other places, like Australia, Mexico, Florida (The Swamp), inuits, and wherever hillbillies live.

    I feel that you and the "Aang ain't white" movement is downplaying the importance of that other 50%, and I feel that since you are so upset with a perceived lack of respect to the "Asianness" of Avatar, not respecting Avatar's other influences (the ones that I personally feel make Avatar Avatar and not just another Animea) is hypocracy.
    You must be registered and logged in to post a message.
  • Avatar of _Flutterlight_

    _Flutterlight_

    [87]Jan 5, 2009
    • member since: 08/29/08
    • level: 15
    • rank: Ginsu Knife
    • posts: 1,393
    And I still think arguing over a cartoon's nationality is stupid.
    You must be registered and logged in to post a message.
  • Avatar of ranger8060

    ranger8060

    [88]Jan 5, 2009
    • member since: 12/01/08
    • level: 7
    • rank: Talk Show Host
    • posts: 365
    _Flutterlight_ wrote:
    And I still think arguing over a cartoon's nationality is stupid.


    trufax
    You must be registered and logged in to post a message.
  • Avatar of Chesis

    Chesis

    [89]Jan 5, 2009
    • member since: 09/29/06
    • level: 2
    • rank: Sweat Hog
    • posts: 29

    _Flutterlight_ wrote:
    And I still think arguing over a cartoon's nationality is stupid.

    Which is why you keep coming back to argue about it, *obviously.*

    If Avatar is like you say, 50% Asian, and 50% not (I think 90% and 10% personally), I'd still say the "not" doesn't have anything to worry about. Now if the film were being made in Hong Kong, then I'd worry about keeping the humor and the the gender balance and the other things that are more Western. But since the Americans are making it, the people in charge don't seem to realize they're working with an Asian-themed show at all, I'm going to worry about THAT.

    Edited on 01/05/2009 9:55pm
    You must be registered and logged in to post a message.
  • Avatar of Jackson5050

    Jackson5050

    [90]Jan 5, 2009
    • member since: 07/23/08
    • level: 12
    • rank: Evil Bert
    • posts: 907
    People are still upset about this non-issue? This is a prime example of people making a mountain out of a mole hill.
    You must be registered and logged in to post a message.
  • Avatar of ThisCrazyGuy

    ThisCrazyGuy

    [91]Jan 6, 2009
    • member since: 08/10/08
    • level: 8
    • rank: Super-Friend
    • posts: 700
    _Flutterlight_ wrote:
    ThisCrazyGuy wrote:

    _Flutterlight_ wrote:
    ThisCrazyGuy wrote:
    _Flutterlight_ wrote:
    And there ARE pleanty of things in Avatar that are not Asian or Inuit.
    Not really, not if you don't nitpick to the max, and look at the big things... All the MAJOR things are Asian-influenced...
    But "looking at the big things" is generalizing, and ignoring a minority. Isn't that what the whole "Aang ain't white" is against? You know what? I CAN say that blue eyes makes the ENTIRE water tribe white, because the inuits didn't GET the genetic mutation for blue eyes. White people did. The "well, eye color is standard between the four nations" argumant is wrong, because that shows how Avatar is AGAIN, not entirely Asian, which was my only point to being with. Avatar is a melting pot which is not controlled by any one set of guidlines or rules, so the movie should not be held to any. What's important is the actors look like their characters and act like their characters. Not where they came from.

    And you REALLY think the actors look their parts? Like seriously, you see a resemblance in Jesse McCartney and Zuko?

    I am talking about the smallest of things, and the most unimportant... You can't take a bird that isn't based and created off of Asian influence, and say that the Avatar world is dominantly Asian-based... Yeah, sure, we might run into a few Australian influences once in a while, but what do you call the influence on 99% of the Avatar world? I am a Mixed-Race person with BLUE eyes, and I have met MANY people who are the same, and so I think it is fairly common to be a tanned person (like, really tanned) with blue or green eyes, White people are not the only people that have them...



    When I said Inuits, I meant 100% inuits. But after a small debate over wether I'd get blasted for that, I deleted it. I would also like to add that white people can be tanned too, especially if they live in a place where they get lots of sun.

    And I already agreed with you: Jessie McCarteny is a HORRIBLE choice for Zuko's actor. I only said I WOULD be happy if the cast looked and acted like their characters. I never said I actually was happy with them.

    My point was that while Avatar may be 50% Asian based, the other 50% comes from other places, like Australia, Mexico, Florida (The Swamp), inuits, and wherever hillbillies live.

    I feel that you and the "Aang ain't white" movement is downplaying the importance of that other 50%, and I feel that since you are so upset with a perceived lack of respect to the "Asianness" of Avatar, not respecting Avatar's other influences (the ones that I personally feel make Avatar Avatar and not just another Animea) is hypocracy.
    I am not really as hardcore as the "Aang Ain't White" movement, comparing me to them is a bit naive... While I agree with them and support them 100%, I am nowhere near as annoyed with this as they are, believe me. And I'm not downplaying anything, I specifically said that there MAY, be other civilizations that influence a FEW things in the Avatar world, but about 85% (possibly more) of the Avatar world, is dominantly Asian/Inuit-based. When did I say that the Water Tribes weren't completely based off of the Inuit's? You say I don't mention the Inuit's, and yet they have been in basically every post of mine...

    50%? Seriously? I would label it more along the lines of 15% of the Avatar world, being based off of other cultures besides Asia/Inuit civilization.
    You must be registered and logged in to post a message.
  • Avatar of Falcondude123

    Falcondude123

    [92]Jan 6, 2009
    • member since: 09/24/06
    • level: 10
    • rank: Holy Level 10!
    • posts: 2,602
    ThisCrazyGuy wrote:
    Falcondude123 wrote:
    ThisCrazyGuy wrote:
    Falcondude123 wrote:
    ThisCrazyGuy wrote:

    This pretty much combats everything against the "Aang Ain't White" protests: http://glockgal.livejournal.com/375625.html?page=3#comments

    I personally couldn't agree more with it. This person also talks about Hollywood-racism in general, and how The Last Airbender had the opportunity to be one of the few movies around, that sticks to it's ORIGINAL theme and roots (no matter Hollywood's commandments), and showcases an Asian (Eastern) theme and influence.

    Okay so I went to the link and was sooo angered by it that I made my own profile just so I could post a lengthy rebuttal. Since the link is already in this quote^, I suggest you go to it and carefully read my response, which I had to break up over three consecutive posts.

    I'm the one posting under "FastestFalcon" on it just so you know.

    Tell me what you think.

    I can see what you are saying, and you BOTH bring up great points. I look forward to seeing what her reply will be.


    She replied, and I replied back. I'll give her this much: she is pretty civil about what she argues, despite being over-devoted to a silly cause.
    I don't think it is completely respectful to call it a "silly cause"... Some people are actually quite offended by this...


    I know they are, it's just I think that they are so engrossed in the principles of this issue that they are not being realistic about what sort of action to take.
    You must be registered and logged in to post a message.
  • Avatar of ThisCrazyGuy

    ThisCrazyGuy

    [93]Jan 6, 2009
    • member since: 08/10/08
    • level: 8
    • rank: Super-Friend
    • posts: 700
    Falcondude123 wrote:
    ThisCrazyGuy wrote:
    Falcondude123 wrote:
    ThisCrazyGuy wrote:
    Falcondude123 wrote:
    ThisCrazyGuy wrote:

    This pretty much combats everything against the "Aang Ain't White" protests: http://glockgal.livejournal.com/375625.html?page=3#comments

    I personally couldn't agree more with it. This person also talks about Hollywood-racism in general, and how The Last Airbender had the opportunity to be one of the few movies around, that sticks to it's ORIGINAL theme and roots (no matter Hollywood's commandments), and showcases an Asian (Eastern) theme and influence.

    Okay so I went to the link and was sooo angered by it that I made my own profile just so I could post a lengthy rebuttal. Since the link is already in this quote^, I suggest you go to it and carefully read my response, which I had to break up over three consecutive posts.

    I'm the one posting under "FastestFalcon" on it just so you know.

    Tell me what you think.

    I can see what you are saying, and you BOTH bring up great points. I look forward to seeing what her reply will be.


    She replied, and I replied back. I'll give her this much: she is pretty civil about what she argues, despite being over-devoted to a silly cause.
    I don't think it is completely respectful to call it a "silly cause"... Some people are actually quite offended by this...


    I know they are, it's just I think that they are so engrossed in the principles of this issue that they are not being realistic about what sort of action to take.
    Fair enough if you think that, I can see to some extent what you are trying to say, but all I'm saying, is labelling something that A LOT of people consider a serious issue as "silly", is quite rude...
    You must be registered and logged in to post a message.
  • Avatar of Falcondude123

    Falcondude123

    [94]Jan 6, 2009
    • member since: 09/24/06
    • level: 10
    • rank: Holy Level 10!
    • posts: 2,602
    ThisCrazyGuy wrote:
    Falcondude123 wrote:
    ThisCrazyGuy wrote:
    Falcondude123 wrote:
    ThisCrazyGuy wrote:
    Falcondude123 wrote:
    ThisCrazyGuy wrote:

    This pretty much combats everything against the "Aang Ain't White" protests: http://glockgal.livejournal.com/375625.html?page=3#comments

    I personally couldn't agree more with it. This person also talks about Hollywood-racism in general, and how The Last Airbender had the opportunity to be one of the few movies around, that sticks to it's ORIGINAL theme and roots (no matter Hollywood's commandments), and showcases an Asian (Eastern) theme and influence.

    Okay so I went to the link and was sooo angered by it that I made my own profile just so I could post a lengthy rebuttal. Since the link is already in this quote^, I suggest you go to it and carefully read my response, which I had to break up over three consecutive posts.

    I'm the one posting under "FastestFalcon" on it just so you know.

    Tell me what you think.

    I can see what you are saying, and you BOTH bring up great points. I look forward to seeing what her reply will be.


    She replied, and I replied back. I'll give her this much: she is pretty civil about what she argues, despite being over-devoted to a silly cause.
    I don't think it is completely respectful to call it a "silly cause"... Some people are actually quite offended by this...


    I know they are, it's just I think that they are so engrossed in the principles of this issue that they are not being realistic about what sort of action to take.
    Fair enough if you think that, I can see to some extent what you are trying to say, but all I'm saying, is labelling something that A LOT of people consider a serious issue as "silly", is quite rude...


    Okay, sorry...
    You must be registered and logged in to post a message.
  • Avatar of _Flutterlight_

    _Flutterlight_

    [95]Jan 6, 2009
    • member since: 08/29/08
    • level: 15
    • rank: Ginsu Knife
    • posts: 1,393
    Chesis wrote:

    _Flutterlight_ wrote:
    And I still think arguing over a cartoon's nationality is stupid.

    Which is why you keep coming back to argue about it, *obviously.*

    If Avatar is like you say, 50% Asian, and 50% not (I think 90% and 10% personally), I'd still say the "not" doesn't have anything to worry about. Now if the film were being made in Hong Kong, then I'd worry about keeping the humor and the the gender balance and the other things that are more Western. But since the Americans are making it, the people in charge don't seem to realize they're working with an Asian-themed show at all, I'm going to worry about THAT.



    I'm TRYING to defend myself, because you and ThisCrazyGuy keep taking me out of context and twisting my words. That's why I keep coming here.

    The Water Tribes (inuits aren't Asian), is at least 20% of Avatar, if not more, especailly because of Katara and Sokka, and by the way, I don't see any inuits complaining about their lack of representation.

    And how do you KNOW that the whole "Fire bending Masters" episode won't get cut from the movie? That wouldn't be fair representation of the Aztecs, would it?

    And maybe instead of spending extra money looking for and hireing Asian and inuit actors, the people making the movie are going to spend their money and effort making really, really accurate set pieces and scenery, and good martial arts instructors for the actors, because like you said, it's really the culture that's important. Not how the characters (or actors) look.

    I say we wait until the movie before we gripe about what a lousy job they do making it "ethnically accurate".
    You must be registered and logged in to post a message.
  • Avatar of _Flutterlight_

    _Flutterlight_

    [96]Jan 6, 2009
    • member since: 08/29/08
    • level: 15
    • rank: Ginsu Knife
    • posts: 1,393
    ThisCrazyGuy wrote:
    I am not really as hardcore as the "Aang Ain't White" movement, comparing me to them is a bit naive... While I agree with them and support them 100%, I am nowhere near as annoyed with this as they are, believe me. And I'm not downplaying anything, I specifically said that there MAY, be other civilizations that influence a FEW things in the Avatar world, but about 85% (possibly more) of the Avatar world, is dominantly Asian/Inuit-based. When did I say that the Water Tribes weren't completely based off of the Inuit's? You say I don't mention the Inuit's, and yet they have been in basically every post of mine...

    50%? Seriously? I would label it more along the lines of 15% of the Avatar world, being based off of other cultures besides Asia/Inuit civilization.


    I would like to point out that I said you AND Aang Ain't white movement, despite the fact that you are "less hard core than them". I was not compairing the two of you, I was lumping you in the same group of things I feel down-play the importance of the minority inflences in Avatar.

    And I NEVER said you didn't mention the inuits. I included the "Inuits" in my list of minorities you are downplaying because while you keep bringing them up, you also keep saying that Avatar is "based off of ASIA", instead of "Based off of Asia and inuits".

    I as am including the Fire Nation's fire-powered machines (and balloons) as part of the outside influence, as Asians and Inuits did not invent them and coal/fire powered war machines (and balloons) are not part of their culture, I feel that the percentage of outside influences at the very least 30%. Maybe 40%. (The Fire Nation uses war machines a LOT.)

    Please stop changing what I say to make me look like a bigot. I'd like to stop having to come here and explain WHAT I said and WHY I said it.
    You must be registered and logged in to post a message.
  • Avatar of ranger8060

    ranger8060

    [97]Jan 6, 2009
    • member since: 12/01/08
    • level: 7
    • rank: Talk Show Host
    • posts: 365
    A lot of people are insinuating race in a place where it is not needed.
    You must be registered and logged in to post a message.
  • Avatar of _Flutterlight_

    _Flutterlight_

    [98]Jan 6, 2009
    • member since: 08/29/08
    • level: 15
    • rank: Ginsu Knife
    • posts: 1,393
    I agree. If the "Asian" and "inuit" culture is so important, like ThisCrazyGuy keeps saying, shouldn't that be what the dirrectors focus on instead of casting ethnically "correct" actors?

    And say a child of Irish decent is adopted by and raised by inuit parents in an inuit community. The child is fully immersed in inuit culture, speaks the language, believes their beliefs, cooks and eats their food, follows their traditions, ect.

    Is the child inuit, or Irish?
    You must be registered and logged in to post a message.
  • Avatar of Chesis

    Chesis

    [99]Jan 6, 2009
    • member since: 09/29/06
    • level: 2
    • rank: Sweat Hog
    • posts: 29
    _Flutterlight_ wrote:
    The Water Tribes (inuits aren't Asian), is at least 20% of Avatar, if not more, especailly because of Katara and Sokka, and by the way, I don't see any inuits complaining about their lack of representation.
    I lumped 'em together because it's easeir to talk about them that way. So you concede at least 70% of the show is taken from non-white sources. That sounds much more reasonable.
    _Flutterlight_ wrote:
    And maybe instead of spending extra money looking for and hireing Asian and inuit actors, the people making the movie are going to spend their money and effort making really, really accurate set pieces and scenery, and good martial arts instructors for the actors, because like you said, it's really the culture that's important. Not how the characters (or actors) look.
    So... you're suggesting we have really accurate Asian and Inuit environments. Populated by all white people. Eh... no, I think that's going to make things even worse.
    You must be registered and logged in to post a message.
  • Avatar of Chesis

    Chesis

    [100]Jan 6, 2009
    • member since: 09/29/06
    • level: 2
    • rank: Sweat Hog
    • posts: 29

    _Flutterlight_ wrote:
    I agree. If the "Asian" and "inuit" culture is so important, like ThisCrazyGuy keeps saying, shouldn't that be what the dirrectors focus on instead of casting ethnically "correct" actors? And say a child of Irish decent is adopted by and raised by inuit parents in an inuit community. The child is fully immersed in inuit culture, speaks the language, believes their beliefs, cooks and eats their food, follows their traditions, ect. Is the child inuit, or Irish?

    I've heard this argument before too. The kid is Inuit, but he's not the best example of someone from the Inuit culture. The thing about Hollywood is, perceptions are very, very important. The people who cast Avatar, cast white kids that *look* white, who audiences will *identify* as white. It doesn't matter if they were all raised on tea and dumplings and spoke perfect Japanese. In the movies, you have to look the part.

    If you have a black character, you cast someone who looks black. If you have Asian characters, either cast people who look Asian, or guess what? They're not Asian. Because the audience won't be able to tell that they're supposed to be Asian.

    Edited on 01/06/2009 8:04pm
    Edited 2 total times.
    You must be registered and logged in to post a message.