Interesting, because I believe there has been 4 production seasons / 5 broadcast seasons. There has to be something that we can find that they'll believe.

I think we found enough. Their only complaint is that it doesn't hold up to Wikipedia's standards or if it does (like the Nick press or Nathan's interview) then they'll find someway to get around it.

Wikipedia standards are quite low. Nathan's interview must be enough for them though. You need to knock some sense into them.

I know. That and the press statement. Kevin just seems to be letting the Nathan interviews slip passed him since he doesn't say much on them. But he's certainly trying to get passed the May 2011 Nick press statement where they reference the broadcast Seasons 2 and 3 clearly stating that the episodes on the "iLove iCarly Collection" came from those two seasons. He first complained with the fact that the press later talked about the release of Season 4 as "The Complete 3rd Season" in June. So? They talked about the DVD release of Season 3 as "Season 2: Volume 3" three months before in February 2011. What the heck do you think Season 4 was going to be titled as and why should that mean anything? It's clear with how "Season 3" was released on DVD the production labels are being accounted for here due to the production cycle. Then Kevin is also complaining with the fact that the press never listed which of the 2xx coding episodes on the set (the coding all the episodes on the set have) goes in which season. Um, we have the two opening intros to do that. But then he and Alec were arguing how opening intros don't mean anything depicting a new season. I argued that they do with lots of shows and certainly did with iCarly, considering the "Season 3" episodes were all directly coded 227-245 with the exception of one episode that was coded 223 that even had the opening and counted in the airing third season episodes.

Yeah. Nathan's interview should be good enough for them. Why is he trying to get passed some sources for.

Strange as all that. Why do they think season 2 wasn't actually split.

Because production-wise, it wasn't. All the "Realible Sources" go by the production cycle. Wikipedia has always gone by the broadcast cycle, and it shoudnt change now.

Btw, I added a new response on there, Huntley.

Though sources seem to go by the production cycle. Not sure why the broadcast season can't just go by the production cycel though.

Marc, I think we had that conversation. I was saying how it was wise for the network to split up the 45 episode second season production so that it wouldn't look to weird going from a season of 25 episodes to 20 episodes, to like 10 episodes than it would be going from a season of 45 episodes all the way down to a very short one.

Okay then. Fair enough.

By the way, that wasn't a question. Already know why though, I was wondering. That's all.

Why do they say tv.com is no good for? Nothing wrong with it though.

Nah - Season 4 always had the 13 episodes that was it.

They say tv.com is not reliable because information submitted from fans of the show. They don't even like IMDB now.

I never have, never will, trust imdb. And I actually was a supporter a the 4b thing, but I just gave in to popular vote.

There busy people, So they might not have time. You could just let Wikipedia do what they want. Each site can do it how they want to put the seasons. If they want to say its season 5 let them. Its not going to do any harm of anything or the world is not going to end. Just call it the season what you want to. Some are calling it season 4 or 5. Here's what someone said on the iCarly wiki
I agree that the season being filmed is Season 5 Technically I still consider iLMM and Season 4 because Dan said Nick was allowed him to add 12 more episodes, but just to go only w/ wiki and other admins calling it season 6. No matter what season you call it. Still excited let it be.

I was only saying that the 4th season was not split.