We're moving Forums to the Community pages. Click here for more information and updates.

iCarly Forums

Nickelodeon (ended 2012)

Seddie And Creddie Battle Field

  • Avatar of Nature9000

    Nature9000

    [301]Jun 17, 2008
    • member since: 11/27/05
    • level: 9
    • rank: Door Number 2
    • posts: 454
    41225525557 wrote:
    Wedgie317 wrote:
    No further comment. I'm not gonna argue just because you're stubborn. So I'm done.
    Fine, u could've just not replied to that, but since u did, I'm writing this for the final word, SEDDIE IS WAY BETTER!


    Both of you, shut up already! You're both being stubborn, you're both saying how you're right and the other's wrong. It's the same old stinking story already! NOW YOU'RE ATTACKING EACH OTHER'S USERNAME?! I swear, it's worse than when someone's arguing with Gryffin...

    Look, I go to say there are slight signs of both relationships. Maybe there are more on Creddie, maybe there are some on Seddie. In EVERY relationship on earth, and television, there are slight possibilities of it occuring. Both of you are right to an extent, now...handle your points MATURELY. Both of you are capable of it, and that's what you do. You listen to the other perspective and then you state your opinion on the reason you think something probably will or will not happen.

    Again, we're in the FIRST SEASON. There is no way to tell what will happen in the first season. You can see in every episode that Freddie and Sam are getting closer (Slowly) Plus, if someone hated each other completely, they would stay FAR APART, surely you notice them usually standing together...

    Freddie and Carly have been growing closer with every episode as well! I'll go so far to say that Carly may be starting to see Freddie in a new light as he grows and matures. But for anyone to say that they KNOW something will or will not be, when the show is still in infant form, that is not handling something very well....sorry I flipped, but still, had to be said.
    You must be registered and logged in to post a message.
  • Avatar of Wedgie317

    Wedgie317

    [302]Jun 17, 2008
    • member since: 07/10/07
    • level: 13
    • rank: Regal Beagle
    • posts: 1,397
    And why do you think I actually did shut up, Nature?
    You must be registered and logged in to post a message.
  • Avatar of Nature9000

    Nature9000

    [303]Jun 17, 2008
    • member since: 11/27/05
    • level: 9
    • rank: Door Number 2
    • posts: 454
    Wedgie317 wrote:
    And why do you think I actually did shut up, Nature?


    Good point, Wedgie XD
    You must be registered and logged in to post a message.
  • Avatar of 41225525557

    41225525557

    [304]Jun 17, 2008
    • member since: 07/09/07
    • level: 8
    • rank: Super-Friend
    • posts: 620
    so what, now I'm the Problem. U would not shut up just as much as me. U had many chances to not reply. I really didn't want to just sit there and let u think that everything u said was right.
    You must be registered and logged in to post a message.
  • Avatar of Nature9000

    Nature9000

    [305]Jun 17, 2008
    • member since: 11/27/05
    • level: 9
    • rank: Door Number 2
    • posts: 454
    41225525557 wrote:
    so what, now I'm the Problem. U would not shut up just as much as me. U had many chances to not reply. I really didn't want to just sit there and let u think that everything u said was right.


    -_- Make note that I never said one of you was a problem. I said both of you and both of you....were equally stubborn. Both said they were right beyond a doubt and neither of you listened to the other or even slightly considered...but eh, it's just like life. When life nips you in the rear, you just have to nip it back...but there's also a part of time you learn to stop nipping back. Like when your alarm clock fails on you and you miss a major test! -_- That's just life paying you back...
    You must be registered and logged in to post a message.
  • Avatar of Wedgie317

    Wedgie317

    [306]Jun 17, 2008
    • member since: 07/10/07
    • level: 13
    • rank: Regal Beagle
    • posts: 1,397
    Hey, I stopped. I'm not blaming you for anythig either. And with that, I can leave off with saying CREDDIE RULES!
    You must be registered and logged in to post a message.
  • Avatar of crzza

    crzza

    [307]Jun 17, 2008
    • member since: 05/28/07
    • level: 49
    • rank: Snufflupugus
    • posts: 12,122
    Yes, you can leave off like that. CREDDIE RULES!
    You must be registered and logged in to post a message.
  • Avatar of Nature9000

    Nature9000

    [308]Jun 17, 2008
    • member since: 11/27/05
    • level: 9
    • rank: Door Number 2
    • posts: 454
    Wedgie317 wrote:
    Hey, I stopped. I'm not blaming you for anythig either. And with that, I can leave off with saying CREDDIE RULES!
    Okay, let's leave off with that. I really don't think there's a reason to continue this. Personally I don't believe that Seddie and Creddie can come together without actually having harsh words for the other, rather than just a civil discussion. I have seen no proof of that in this thread or any other, it turns into a very unecessary war. I would opt for segregation between the two, but that's just me. So let's leave it off with that. Seddie and Creddie, may the next season shed even more light on these two controversial topics.
    Edited on 06/17/2008 2:36pm
    You must be registered and logged in to post a message.
  • Avatar of crzza

    crzza

    [309]Jun 17, 2008
    • member since: 05/28/07
    • level: 49
    • rank: Snufflupugus
    • posts: 12,122
    Nature9000 wrote:
    Wedgie317 wrote:
    Hey, I stopped. I'm not blaming you for anythig either. And with that, I can leave off with saying CREDDIE RULES!
    Okay, let's leave off with that. I really don't think there's a reason to continue this. Personally I don't believe that Seddie and Creddie can come together without actually having harsh words for the other, rather than just a civil discussion. I have seen no proof of that in this thread or any other, it turns into a very unecessary war. I would opt for segregation between the two, but that's just me. So let's leave it off with that. Seddie and Creddie, may the next season shed even more light on these two controversial topics.
    Well, it is called a "battle" field.
    You must be registered and logged in to post a message.
  • Avatar of Nature9000

    Nature9000

    [310]Jun 17, 2008
    • member since: 11/27/05
    • level: 9
    • rank: Door Number 2
    • posts: 454
    crzza wrote:
    Nature9000 wrote:
    Wedgie317 wrote:
    Hey, I stopped. I'm not blaming you for anythig either. And with that, I can leave off with saying CREDDIE RULES!
    Okay, let's leave off with that. I really don't think there's a reason to continue this. Personally I don't believe that Seddie and Creddie can come together without actually having harsh words for the other, rather than just a civil discussion. I have seen no proof of that in this thread or any other, it turns into a very unecessary war. I would opt for segregation between the two, but that's just me. So let's leave it off with that. Seddie and Creddie, may the next season shed even more light on these two controversial topics.
    Well, it is called a "battle" field.


    You don't say? -_- And we're better off without it as far as I'm concerned. Seriously, putting Seddie and Creddie supporters in one thread...it makes so mamy fights that anyone who comes along will read it and say "Oh, I can't post here! It's worse than the Hannah Montana thread!" We have a Creddie thread, we have a Seddie thread...therefore the two worlds can be at peace and get along with each other elsewhere without a Creddie going into Seddie and vice versa.
    You must be registered and logged in to post a message.
  • Avatar of crzza

    crzza

    [311]Jun 17, 2008
    • member since: 05/28/07
    • level: 49
    • rank: Snufflupugus
    • posts: 12,122
    Nature9000 wrote:
    crzza wrote:
    Nature9000 wrote:
    Wedgie317 wrote:
    Hey, I stopped. I'm not blaming you for anythig either. And with that, I can leave off with saying CREDDIE RULES!
    Okay, let's leave off with that. I really don't think there's a reason to continue this. Personally I don't believe that Seddie and Creddie can come together without actually having harsh words for the other, rather than just a civil discussion. I have seen no proof of that in this thread or any other, it turns into a very unecessary war. I would opt for segregation between the two, but that's just me. So let's leave it off with that. Seddie and Creddie, may the next season shed even more light on these two controversial topics.
    Well, it is called a "battle" field.


    You don't say? -_- And we're better off without it as far as I'm concerned. Seriously, putting Seddie and Creddie supporters in one thread...it makes so mamy fights that anyone who comes along will read it and say "Oh, I can't post here! It's worse than the Hannah Montana thread!" We have a Creddie thread, we have a Seddie thread...therefore the two worlds can be at peace and get along with each other elsewhere without a Creddie going into Seddie and vice versa.
    Like I said ion the other thread, its fun to argue.
    You must be registered and logged in to post a message.
  • Avatar of Nature9000

    Nature9000

    [312]Jun 17, 2008
    • member since: 11/27/05
    • level: 9
    • rank: Door Number 2
    • posts: 454
    Yeah, I'm sure it is...*Shakes head* No comment...seriously though, we already have a battle on Seddie, a battle on Creddie, why do we even need this thing?
    You must be registered and logged in to post a message.
  • Avatar of AndreaMSkate

    AndreaMSkate

    [313]Jun 17, 2008
    • member since: 12/20/07
    • level: 49
    • rank: Snufflupugus
    • posts: 12,207
    This thread is all one big argument. We have a Seddie thread and a Creddie thread, which both seem to be "Creddie/Seddie battlefields" as it is. I've been considering locking this for a while.
    You must be registered and logged in to post a message.