Nickelodeon (ended 2012)
Ruffmanfan882 wrote: | ||
This content is currently unavailable The page you requested cannot be displayed right now. It may be temporarily unavailable, the link you clicked on may have expired, or you may not have permission to view this page. It doesn't work. |
Unfortunately Marcdragicevic, Dan's blog is being considered "unreliable" by Kevin Brogers over on Wikipedia who is so anxious at keeping Seasons 2 and 3 kept as one season. Now he came across the excuse that iTunes and Amazon don't list the episodes as seasons but as volumes. That just made me scratch my head, considering that the volumes are basically the seasons in their broadcast labels with all of their episodes listed in each one. I swear, he's so fixed on the fact that sources label Season 2 as a whole 45 episode season which doesn't surprise me as I told him press releases do that since they follow the production labels. A good number of these sites are copy-overs anyway and we have many sources indicating a split season.
marcdragicevic wrote: | ||||
I figured it out for one of the last links. If you have a facebook you must log in to view it. Noah must have set is page to only facebook viewers, where Dan lets you see his facebook when you not logged in. |
Ruffmanfan882 wrote: | ||||||
For facebook, I was logged in. |
Nick works differently than Disney. Plus, iCarly had a whole production season of 45 episodes lined up. That's way more than what's been aired on a regular basis for a season for Nick. It makes sense why they would split it up in the marketing. The highest season of episodes Disney had was 39 in the second season of "The Suite Life of Zack & Cody" that lasted from 2006-2007. Speaking of "iCarly" Season 2, we simply can't ignore that after 25 of them aired from September 2008 to August 2009, the last 20 that aired from September 2009 to June 2010 were given a whole new sequence. We have Dan's blog where he is confident of this and talks of how the network was referring remaining episodes of the Season 2 production as the "third season", two interviews with Nathan Kress before the airing of Season 4 and Season 5 that can be seen on Youtube where the broadcast labeled seasons are referred to as so. You think Nathan would have corrected these people if they were wrong had no split took place? You think Dan would have said something regarding the split if it never happened? Even when it was talked about at the time it took place? We have many web sources and sites such as Amazon and iTunes that have the seasons labeled like this. Were they wrong too? As for "iLost My Mind" it's understandable why it wasn't labeled as the premiere of a new season. It's not because it was the first one within two months but that the episode was produced second whereas "iDate Sam & Freddie" was made first. Had "iLost My Mind" been produced first then it likely would have been referred to as the premiere of the new season.
Disney also promoted "Season 3" of Wizards of Waverly Place as such by the way before it began in October 2009.
Dan was absolutely certain on the issue. He was uncertain on when the transition was to happen however. When he wrote the blog on September 1, 2009 the last Season 2 episode to air was "iFight Shelby Marx". He just didn't know when Season 2 was going to end and when Season 3 was going to begin. He was already working on a new opening sequence and even concluded the topic with "Season 2 is airing now" (thinking a couple more episodes would have aired in the broadcast season but the next one would actually be where the marketed third season would start 11 days later he must have found out about soon afterwards) and "The third season starts airing in a few weeks". But yeah, you contact some one at Nick. But that may not help because you still need a reliable source to convince Mr. Brogers who obviously didn't taking Dan's word into consideration. We just had another dispute and it's not working out at all. I raised a few more points and they were all blown over. We need something quick. I'm running out of defenses here. See if they can write something regarding the show's seasons on TV.
Ruffmanfan882 wrote: |
I posted a note to the Nick Writing Fellowship program facebook to see if I can get a better person to contact about this. I know Dan is great but I really think he does not know him self. |
marcdragicevic wrote: |
Can we please use paragraphs, haha. |
I'm sticking with the oppression that Dan did know about the split and how I described the whole confusion thing he plays at the start of his blog is what I believe to be the case. I just find it hard to believe that he didn't know but then ended his blog topic being so confident about it. I just tried to see if I could contact the Nick company like if they had a twitter or something.
marcdragicevic wrote: |
Thanks. So what are we going to do about this split issue thingo? I don't think Nick. will reply back to the issue though. |
pscf3 wrote: | ||
For the site, i'd keep it the way it is.
|
marcdragicevic wrote: |
Thanks. So what are we going to do about this split issue thingo? I don't think Nick. will reply back to the issue though. |