Nickelodeon (ended 2008)
Tessa- Thanks I used one
I hope someone in the TV staff or Mods listen to Wiselads ideas. Maybe the forum can be a peaceful place again (with non-crazy Mods)
WiseLad wrote: |
dear water78 we have "the racco show", and than someone posts who is a fan of "the prince of the shadowlight kingdom" "this show is super-retarded, the fans are dumb-$#$#$, and the actors don't have any talent whatsoever, they need to go to the streets and panhandle" that I can understand and agree that they should get TOS but another member says "the racco show is IN MY OPINION childish, but some fans enjoy that, and I respect that, even if I don't understand why. I think the actors should try to improve their skills, in order to improve their chances in their career" basically same thing yet different and more constructive, and in this last case, i don't see why it should get a TOS, but if it gets reported, it will get TOS because someone considered flaming its fav show, and reported it |
danmod wrote: |
Wiselad, the examples you supplied are not at all accurate. We're not handing out TOS violations just for kicks and we're not unapproachable robots who burn you for asking questions. That doesn't happen. Ever. Someone may report you for no reason, but if that's the case, nothing will happen. Staff and the Mods research every violation in our queue and make decisions based on the facts. |
Water78 wrote: | ||||||
|
CATFIGHT!!!!!
Water78 wrote: | ||||||
craegan just shut ur face |
DreadedMedusa wrote: |
Words from Brady at The Refuge: Well, I logged onto TV.com today to see how I was doing in the Disciple voting. And I found a new message in my folder. It said that I had been banned from TV.com for 7 days, which means I can't vote for Disciples anymore. Here is the message I recieved: http://i338.photobucket.com/albums/n431/BradyBannister5/Untitled38.jpg Well, I wondered something: Why would I be suspended from TV.com? I had no part in the Rebellion other than simply trying to calm everyone down and laughing at some of the funny posts. Well, apparently, laughing is Disruptive and Off Topic (sarcasm). I'm not sure if my added TOS (which I have VERY LITTLE of) or just this one post did it, but this is the last TOS I got before getting suspended. Apparently, I was suspended because of the post below: http://i338.photobucket.com/albums/n431/BradyBannister5/Untitled39.jpg Yep, THIS is the Straw that broke the Camels back. THIS is disruptive. Apparently, you can't just laugh at someone else's trollish thread without being suspended. Basically, people were putting troll threads. One was called "My mom eats pancakes." To calm everyone down, I simply laughed at the title using a laughing smilie. But, that's disruptive posting and I deserve to be suspended for it! (/sarcasm again) Really TV.com, I can understand suspending the person who put this thread, and I can maybe understand giving me a TOS WARNING for replying, but when your suspending ME, just for replying to one thread, THINGS GET BAD! Why must they torture us like this? I have done nothing wrong on TV.com, and I didn't troll the forums. I just can't understand it. Thanks to this, I cannot place my final vote for Disciple, of which I had already made up my mind. Please, everyone read this and reply, I wanna hear what everyone has to say. ----------------------------- * walks out * |
yeah that's just ridiculous. there is no reason you should have been banned.
Water78 wrote: | ||||||
craegan just shut ur face |
DreadedMedusa wrote: |
Words from Brady at The Refuge: Well, I logged onto TV.com today to see how I was doing in the Disciple voting. And I found a new message in my folder. It said that I had been banned from TV.com for 7 days, which means I can't vote for Disciples anymore. Here is the message I recieved: http://i338.photobucket.com/albums/n431/BradyBannister5/Untitled38.jpg Well, I wondered something: Why would I be suspended from TV.com? I had no part in the Rebellion other than simply trying to calm everyone down and laughing at some of the funny posts. Well, apparently, laughing is Disruptive and Off Topic (sarcasm). I'm not sure if my added TOS (which I have VERY LITTLE of) or just this one post did it, but this is the last TOS I got before getting suspended. Apparently, I was suspended because of the post below: http://i338.photobucket.com/albums/n431/BradyBannister5/Untitled39.jpg Yep, THIS is the Straw that broke the Camels back. THIS is disruptive. Apparently, you can't just laugh at someone else's trollish thread without being suspended. Basically, people were putting troll threads. One was called "My mom eats pancakes." To calm everyone down, I simply laughed at the title using a laughing smilie. But, that's disruptive posting and I deserve to be suspended for it! (/sarcasm again) Really TV.com, I can understand suspending the person who put this thread, and I can maybe understand giving me a TOS WARNING for replying, but when your suspending ME, just for replying to one thread, THINGS GET BAD! Why must they torture us like this? I have done nothing wrong on TV.com, and I didn't troll the forums. I just can't understand it. Thanks to this, I cannot place my final vote for Disciple, of which I had already made up my mind. Please, everyone read this and reply, I wanna hear what everyone has to say. ----------------------------- * walks out * |
LondonParisNYC wrote: | ||
yeah that's just ridiculous. there is no reason you should have been banned. |
WiseLad wrote: |
dear water78 not at all, I respect your opinions, I just want you to look at both sides there is a difference between "this is the law, do it my way or take the highway" and "I will consider your frustrations and ponder things you are frustrated about, but I got to warn you that at the end I might decide to keep things exactly or mostly as they are currently" |