Join

We're moving Forums to the Community pages. Click here for more information and updates.

SpongeBob SquarePants Forums

Weekdays 5:00 PM on NickelodeonIn Season

The Perfect Fry Cook

New Message

page:

1
2
3

talonmalon333

[21]Dec 8, 2008

member since: 10/06/06
level: 27
rank: Shark Jumper
posts: 6,574

JellyFishJammer wrote:

Well, you just have to see Neptune's Spatula, it was supposed to be the greatest fry cook ever, right? So that means that's SpongeBob. As for Jim, I think Mr. Krabs is just a jerk that doesn't deserves SpongeBob and can't see how great of a fry cook he is. Maybe he likes Jim better because he is rich.

... or... perhaps Jim was just plain better than SpongeBob.

RedSoxFan274 wrote:

Exactly, if Jim was better than SpongeBob, then HE would have been the one summoned by Neptune.

I believe you guys are just thinking too much, and are making a big out of a small event, while ignoring the facts stated: Jim > SpongeBob.

Besides which, King Neptune said that only a worthy fry cook could pull it out, not "the greatest fry cook".

You must be registered and logged in to post a message.

RedSoxFan274

[22]Dec 8, 2008

member since: 08/30/08
level: 14
rank: Autobot
posts: 1,941

talonmalon333 wrote:

JellyFishJammer wrote:

Well, you just have to see Neptune's Spatula, it was supposed to be the greatest fry cook ever, right? So that means that's SpongeBob. As for Jim, I think Mr. Krabs is just a jerk that doesn't deserves SpongeBob and can't see how great of a fry cook he is. Maybe he likes Jim better because he is rich.

... or... perhaps Jim was just plain better than SpongeBob.

RedSoxFan274 wrote:

Exactly, if Jim was better than SpongeBob, then HE would have been the one summoned by Neptune.

I believe you guys are just thinking too much, and are making a big out of a small event, while ignoring the facts stated: Jim > SpongeBob.

Besides which, King Neptune said that only a worthy fry cook could pull it out, not "the greatest fry cook".

Jim was just a perfectionist, and SpongeBob is to some degree, but Jim just takes it to a whole different level and I think it is somewhat exaggerated that he was the best. I mean, if that was the case, he wouldn't have just had an appearance in one small episode.

You must be registered and logged in to post a message.

talonmalon333

[23]Dec 9, 2008

member since: 10/06/06
level: 27
rank: Shark Jumper
posts: 6,574

RedSoxFan274 wrote:

Jim was just a perfectionist, and SpongeBob is to some degree, but Jim just takes it to a whole different level and I think it is somewhat exaggerated that he was the best. I mean, if that was the case, he wouldn't have just had an appearance in one small episode.

Pal, this isn't even an argument. It's just you denying the blatantly obvious.

It is flat out stated that Jim is better than SpongeBob. Accept it.

You must be registered and logged in to post a message.

RedSoxFan274

[24]Dec 9, 2008

member since: 08/30/08
level: 14
rank: Autobot
posts: 1,941

talonmalon333 wrote:

RedSoxFan274 wrote:

Jim was just a perfectionist, and SpongeBob is to some degree, but Jim just takes it to a whole different level and I think it is somewhat exaggerated that he was the best. I mean, if that was the case, he wouldn't have just had an appearance in one small episode.

Pal, this isn't even an argument. It's just you denying the blatantly obvious.

It is flat out stated that Jim is better than SpongeBob. Accept it.

This is not a matter of fact, so much as it is a matter of opinion. Like I say, everybody is entitled to their own opinion. So, I'm not saying I have anything wrong with you believing Jim is the best, I'm just saying that because of the fact that we all love SpongeBob and Jim has never been mentioned before other than this one episode, naturally the majority of the crowd is going to say SpongeBob's better. Fry cooking is one of those things that can't be judged by fact, it has to be judged by opinion. There's no timer or score in fry cooking, or any cooking for that matter, that's going to tell who's better or not. It's all a matter of what the person thinks of the food.

Edited on 12/09/2008 3:28pm

You must be registered and logged in to post a message.

talonmalon333

[25]Dec 9, 2008

member since: 10/06/06
level: 27
rank: Shark Jumper
posts: 6,574

RedSoxFan274 wrote:

talonmalon333 wrote:

RedSoxFan274 wrote:

Jim was just a perfectionist, and SpongeBob is to some degree, but Jim just takes it to a whole different level and I think it is somewhat exaggerated that he was the best. I mean, if that was the case, he wouldn't have just had an appearance in one small episode.

Pal, this isn't even an argument. It's just you denying the blatantly obvious.

It is flat out stated that Jim is better than SpongeBob. Accept it.

This is not a matter of fact, so much as it is a matter of opinion. Like I say, everybody is entitled to their own opinion. So, I'm not saying I have anything wrong with you believing Jim is the best, I'm just saying that because of the fact that we all love SpongeBob and Jim has never been mentioned before other than this one episode, naturally the majority of the crowd is going to say SpongeBob's better. Fry cooking is one of those things that can't be judged by fact, it has to be judged by opinion. There's no timer or score in fry cooking, or any cooking for that matter, that's going to tell who's better or not. It's all a matter of what the person thinks of the food.

You don't get it, do you? Why do you think they constantly note that Jim is the better fry cook in the episode? There is a certain level that fry cooks have because they are better than others. Mr. Krabs even said that SpongeBob has something going for him, and by all means it's not that he is the better fry cook.

I can give a list of reasons but I won't. Basically, I think it comes down to the fact that you are such a big SpongeBob fan and you want him to be the better fry cook. Sorry, I like him to, but let's stay realistic here.

You must be registered and logged in to post a message.

RedSoxFan274

[26]Dec 9, 2008

member since: 08/30/08
level: 14
rank: Autobot
posts: 1,941

talonmalon333 wrote:

RedSoxFan274 wrote:

talonmalon333 wrote:

RedSoxFan274 wrote:

Jim was just a perfectionist, and SpongeBob is to some degree, but Jim just takes it to a whole different level and I think it is somewhat exaggerated that he was the best. I mean, if that was the case, he wouldn't have just had an appearance in one small episode.

Pal, this isn't even an argument. It's just you denying the blatantly obvious.

It is flat out stated that Jim is better than SpongeBob. Accept it.

This is not a matter of fact, so much as it is a matter of opinion. Like I say, everybody is entitled to their own opinion. So, I'm not saying I have anything wrong with you believing Jim is the best, I'm just saying that because of the fact that we all love SpongeBob and Jim has never been mentioned before other than this one episode, naturally the majority of the crowd is going to say SpongeBob's better. Fry cooking is one of those things that can't be judged by fact, it has to be judged by opinion. There's no timer or score in fry cooking, or any cooking for that matter, that's going to tell who's better or not. It's all a matter of what the person thinks of the food.

You don't get it, do you? Why do you think they constantly note that Jim is the better fry cook in the episode? There is a certain level that fry cooks have because they are better than others. Mr. Krabs even said that SpongeBob has something going for him, and by all means it's not that he is the better fry cook.

I can give a list of reasons but I won't. Basically, I think it comes down to the fact that you are such a big SpongeBob fan and you want him to be the better fry cook. Sorry, I like him to, but let's stay realistic here.

Like I said before, when it comes to cooking it's more a matter of opinion. For example, Paula Deen and Bobby Flay are both great cooks on an equal level, but someone might like one chef's food better than the other's. So how about we just compromise and end this argument by saying that they are equal.

You must be registered and logged in to post a message.

talonmalon333

[27]Dec 10, 2008

member since: 10/06/06
level: 27
rank: Shark Jumper
posts: 6,574

RedSoxFan274 wrote:

talonmalon333 wrote:

RedSoxFan274 wrote:

talonmalon333 wrote:

RedSoxFan274 wrote:

Jim was just a perfectionist, and SpongeBob is to some degree, but Jim just takes it to a whole different level and I think it is somewhat exaggerated that he was the best. I mean, if that was the case, he wouldn't have just had an appearance in one small episode.

Pal, this isn't even an argument. It's just you denying the blatantly obvious.

It is flat out stated that Jim is better than SpongeBob. Accept it.

This is not a matter of fact, so much as it is a matter of opinion. Like I say, everybody is entitled to their own opinion. So, I'm not saying I have anything wrong with you believing Jim is the best, I'm just saying that because of the fact that we all love SpongeBob and Jim has never been mentioned before other than this one episode, naturally the majority of the crowd is going to say SpongeBob's better. Fry cooking is one of those things that can't be judged by fact, it has to be judged by opinion. There's no timer or score in fry cooking, or any cooking for that matter, that's going to tell who's better or not. It's all a matter of what the person thinks of the food.

You don't get it, do you? Why do you think they constantly note that Jim is the better fry cook in the episode? There is a certain level that fry cooks have because they are better than others. Mr. Krabs even said that SpongeBob has something going for him, and by all means it's not that he is the better fry cook.

I can give a list of reasons but I won't. Basically, I think it comes down to the fact that you are such a big SpongeBob fan and you want him to be the better fry cook. Sorry, I like him to, but let's stay realistic here.

Like I said before, when it comes to cooking it's more a matter of opinion. For example, Paula Deen and Bobby Flay are both great cooks on an equal level, but someone might like one chef's food better than the other's. So how about we just compromise and end this argument by saying that they are equal.

Alright, there's no point in arguing with you, because you don't seem to want to admit that Jim was better, when clearly he was. You're crazy if you think I will admit to being wrong without you proving me wrong. Unless you can give anything to prove they were equal, then I am done waisting my time here.

You must be registered and logged in to post a message.

RedSoxFan274

[28]Dec 10, 2008

member since: 08/30/08
level: 14
rank: Autobot
posts: 1,941

talonmalon333 wrote:

RedSoxFan274 wrote:

talonmalon333 wrote:

RedSoxFan274 wrote:

talonmalon333 wrote:

RedSoxFan274 wrote:

Jim was just a perfectionist, and SpongeBob is to some degree, but Jim just takes it to a whole different level and I think it is somewhat exaggerated that he was the best. I mean, if that was the case, he wouldn't have just had an appearance in one small episode.

Pal, this isn't even an argument. It's just you denying the blatantly obvious.

It is flat out stated that Jim is better than SpongeBob. Accept it.

This is not a matter of fact, so much as it is a matter of opinion. Like I say, everybody is entitled to their own opinion. So, I'm not saying I have anything wrong with you believing Jim is the best, I'm just saying that because of the fact that we all love SpongeBob and Jim has never been mentioned before other than this one episode, naturally the majority of the crowd is going to say SpongeBob's better. Fry cooking is one of those things that can't be judged by fact, it has to be judged by opinion. There's no timer or score in fry cooking, or any cooking for that matter, that's going to tell who's better or not. It's all a matter of what the person thinks of the food.

You don't get it, do you? Why do you think they constantly note that Jim is the better fry cook in the episode? There is a certain level that fry cooks have because they are better than others. Mr. Krabs even said that SpongeBob has something going for him, and by all means it's not that he is the better fry cook.

I can give a list of reasons but I won't. Basically, I think it comes down to the fact that you are such a big SpongeBob fan and you want him to be the better fry cook. Sorry, I like him to, but let's stay realistic here.

Like I said before, when it comes to cooking it's more a matter of opinion. For example, Paula Deen and Bobby Flay are both great cooks on an equal level, but someone might like one chef's food better than the other's. So how about we just compromise and end this argument by saying that they are equal.

Alright, there's no point in arguing with you, because you don't seem to want to admit that Jim was better, when clearly he was. You're crazy if you think I will admit to being wrong without you proving me wrong. Unless you can give anything to prove they were equal, then I am done waisting my time here.

Ok, ok! Jim's better! Ok, are you happy now? Can we end this argument?

Edited on 12/10/2008 12:50pm

You must be registered and logged in to post a message.

talonmalon333
[29]Dec 10, 2008
member since: 10/06/06
level: 27
rank: Shark Jumper
posts: 6,574
I already said I was done arguing.
---
Now I'm putting us back on topic. Does anyone think SpongeBob ever will get better than Jim?
You must be registered and logged in to post a message.

ilovejn

[30]Dec 10, 2008

member since: 06/02/08
level: 9
rank: Door Number 2
posts: 854

talonmalon333 wrote:

RedSoxFan274 wrote:

talonmalon333 wrote:

RedSoxFan274 wrote:

talonmalon333 wrote:

RedSoxFan274 wrote:

Jim was just a perfectionist, and SpongeBob is to some degree, but Jim just takes it to a whole different level and I think it is somewhat exaggerated that he was the best. I mean, if that was the case, he wouldn't have just had an appearance in one small episode.

Pal, this isn't even an argument. It's just you denying the blatantly obvious.

It is flat out stated that Jim is better than SpongeBob. Accept it.

This is not a matter of fact, so much as it is a matter of opinion. Like I say, everybody is entitled to their own opinion. So, I'm not saying I have anything wrong with you believing Jim is the best, I'm just saying that because of the fact that we all love SpongeBob and Jim has never been mentioned before other than this one episode, naturally the majority of the crowd is going to say SpongeBob's better. Fry cooking is one of those things that can't be judged by fact, it has to be judged by opinion. There's no timer or score in fry cooking, or any cooking for that matter, that's going to tell who's better or not. It's all a matter of what the person thinks of the food.

You don't get it, do you? Why do you think they constantly note that Jim is the better fry cook in the episode? There is a certain level that fry cooks have because they are better than others. Mr. Krabs even said that SpongeBob has something going for him, and by all means it's not that he is the better fry cook.

I can give a list of reasons but I won't. Basically, I think it comes down to the fact that you are such a big SpongeBob fan and you want him to be the better fry cook. Sorry, I like him to, but let's stay realistic here.

Like I said before, when it comes to cooking it's more a matter of opinion. For example, Paula Deen and Bobby Flay are both great cooks on an equal level, but someone might like one chef's food better than the other's. So how about we just compromise and end this argument by saying that they are equal.

Alright, there's no point in arguing with you, because you don't seem to want to admit that Jim was better, when clearly he was. You're crazy if you think I will admit to being wrong without you proving me wrong. Unless you can give anything to prove they were equal, then I am done waisting my time here.

Please calm down! It's just a cartoon! Does it really matter who is better?!

You must be registered and logged in to post a message.

eggs_aRe_fun

[31]Dec 10, 2008

member since: 09/15/08
level: 13
rank: Regal Beagle
posts: 997

ilovejn wrote:

talonmalon333 wrote:

RedSoxFan274 wrote:

talonmalon333 wrote:

RedSoxFan274 wrote:

talonmalon333 wrote:

RedSoxFan274 wrote:

Jim was just a perfectionist, and SpongeBob is to some degree, but Jim just takes it to a whole different level and I think it is somewhat exaggerated that he was the best. I mean, if that was the case, he wouldn't have just had an appearance in one small episode.

Pal, this isn't even an argument. It's just you denying the blatantly obvious.

It is flat out stated that Jim is better than SpongeBob. Accept it.

This is not a matter of fact, so much as it is a matter of opinion. Like I say, everybody is entitled to their own opinion. So, I'm not saying I have anything wrong with you believing Jim is the best, I'm just saying that because of the fact that we all love SpongeBob and Jim has never been mentioned before other than this one episode, naturally the majority of the crowd is going to say SpongeBob's better. Fry cooking is one of those things that can't be judged by fact, it has to be judged by opinion. There's no timer or score in fry cooking, or any cooking for that matter, that's going to tell who's better or not. It's all a matter of what the person thinks of the food.

You don't get it, do you? Why do you think they constantly note that Jim is the better fry cook in the episode? There is a certain level that fry cooks have because they are better than others. Mr. Krabs even said that SpongeBob has something going for him, and by all means it's not that he is the better fry cook.

I can give a list of reasons but I won't. Basically, I think it comes down to the fact that you are such a big SpongeBob fan and you want him to be the better fry cook. Sorry, I like him to, but let's stay realistic here.

Like I said before, when it comes to cooking it's more a matter of opinion. For example, Paula Deen and Bobby Flay are both great cooks on an equal level, but someone might like one chef's food better than the other's. So how about we just compromise and end this argument by saying that they are equal.

Alright, there's no point in arguing with you, because you don't seem to want to admit that Jim was better, when clearly he was. You're crazy if you think I will admit to being wrong without you proving me wrong. Unless you can give anything to prove they were equal, then I am done waisting my time here.

Please calm down! It's just a cartoon! Does it really matter who is better?!

Nope!

You must be registered and logged in to post a message.

talonmalon333
[32]Dec 10, 2008
member since: 10/06/06
level: 27
rank: Shark Jumper
posts: 6,574
ilovejn wrote:

Please calm down! It's just a cartoon! Does it really matter who is better?!
Not only did you miss the point of that topic, but you also missed our last couple of posts.
Let's stay on topic.

You must be registered and logged in to post a message.
RedSoxFan274
[33]Dec 10, 2008
member since: 08/30/08
level: 14
rank: Autobot
posts: 1,941
Yes, we've concluded this argument, so can we please just move on?
You must be registered and logged in to post a message.

ilovejn

[34]Dec 10, 2008

member since: 06/02/08
level: 9
rank: Door Number 2
posts: 854

talonmalon333 wrote:

ilovejn wrote:

Please calm down! It's just a cartoon! Does it really matter who is better?!

Not only did you miss the point of that topic, but you also missed our last couple of posts.

Let's stay on topic.

No actually, I read the other posts just clearly and I understood the point of hat argument just fine, thank you for asking!

You must be registered and logged in to post a message.

JellyFishJammer
[35]Dec 10, 2008
member since: 07/07/08
level: 29
rank: Volgar the Enforcer
posts: 3,356
Guys, it's a CARTOON, in case you haven't notice, we actually can't tell who's better because it's NOT REAL!
You must be registered and logged in to post a message.
RedSoxFan274
[36]Dec 11, 2008
member since: 08/30/08
level: 14
rank: Autobot
posts: 1,941
JellyFishJammer wrote:

Guys, it's a CARTOON, in case you haven't notice, we actually can't tell who's better because it's NOT REAL!

Hey, I wasn't the one who started this, don't look at me. I was just trying to state my opinion.
You must be registered and logged in to post a message.
ilovejn
[37]Dec 11, 2008
member since: 06/02/08
level: 9
rank: Door Number 2
posts: 854
JellyFishJammer wrote:

Guys, it's a CARTOON, in case you haven't notice, we actually can't tell who's better because it's NOT REAL!
That's what I said in my other post, but talonmalon333 said I didn't understand the point of the topic!
You must be registered and logged in to post a message.
RedSoxFan274
[38]Dec 11, 2008
member since: 08/30/08
level: 14
rank: Autobot
posts: 1,941
Bottom line: This. Argument. Is. Over.
You must be registered and logged in to post a message.
PokeSponge123
[39]Dec 11, 2008
member since: 07/13/08
level: 20
rank: Cow Bell
posts: 5,574
Yeah. I guess it's just typical TV.com for a "creative disucssion" to happen over something like this.
You must be registered and logged in to post a message.

talonmalon333

[40]Dec 11, 2008

member since: 10/06/06
level: 27
rank: Shark Jumper
posts: 6,574

JellyFishJammer wrote:

Guys, it's a CARTOON, in case you haven't notice, we actually can't tell who's better because it's NOT REAL!

I said it before, and I'll say it again. Jim was better. We know that.

ilovejn wrote:

JellyFishJammer wrote:

Guys, it's a CARTOON, in case you haven't notice, we actually can't tell who's better because it's NOT REAL!

That's what I said in my other post, but talonmalon333 said I didn't understand the point of the topic!

Yeah that's exactly what I said.

Edited on 12/11/2008 1:58pm

You must be registered and logged in to post a message.

page:

1
2
3

Choose background:

Shows | Movies | Web | People | News | Videos | Community

Listings | Photos | Forums | Closed Captioning | Rating Guidelines

CBS Entertainment About CBS Interactive | About TV.com | Contact Us | Jobs | Advertise

© 2016 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. TV Guide Digital Network | Privacy Policy | Ad Choice | Terms of Use