Nickelodeon (ended 2008)
metalcurtainrod wrote: | ||||
|
I didnt say that. I'm not?? quite sure which one I think is better but if I really had to choose it would proably be Avatar
BradyBannister5 wrote: | ||||
heck yeah |
To bad we can only dream
avatardanny13 wrote: |
Disney relly owns nick.Disney Channel is mostel goodies goodies show and not much action so they put it on nick.Nick is kind of everything for all ages.Disney is not. |
Uhh...no. Viacom owns Nick. Disney is another entitiy entirly. If it was part of disney, then the Nick studios in Orlando Florida would be in Disney Land(or world, not sure), not in Universal Studios, where it actually is.
BradyBannister5 wrote: |
if there was a movie, it would probably be a movie to wrap up the series, like the movie could be about Aang facing his destiny, or something else that might happen after that. but it would be awesome and they would be able to put in stuff that they can't put on tv. stuff like possibly blood and making out. oh wait thats right Sokka and Yue made out on tv. . anyway, it would be cool and full of action and just awesome. that would get nick probably over a million??dollars in the first weekend of the movie. plus i've always wanted to watch avatar on the big screen. but mostly, i've always wanted to watch avatar while eating pop-corn |
Taang_Forever wrote: | ||
|
Yeah, But I've been wondering about how much it will cost for the upgrade to the animation and now it's going to be over a million well the cool thing is that the creatoes will let certain thmes past and we'll have some more mature content since you can't show that on tv.
Colonel_Brian wrote: | ||||
Yeah, But I've been wondering about how much it will cost for the upgrade to the animation and now it's going to be over a million well the cool thing is that the creatoes will let certain thmes past and we'll have some more mature content since you can't show that on tv. |
Diagreed. On TV or not, Avatar still has littler fans that would no doubt go see the movie, and upping the rating would be inappropriate. Although it depends on what you mean by mature content...?
littleLIVEwire wrote: | ||||||
Diagreed. On TV or not, Avatar still has littler fans that would no doubt go see the movie, and upping the rating would be inappropriate. Although it depends on what you mean by mature content...? |
What I mean was be able to show more of those skeltons like Gyatso's and minor scars like Zuko got at the seige of the north.