Nickelodeon (ended 2008)
sluggmunki_tx wrote: |
Oh, and this should be on the Ask a Question, Get and Answer thread. |
As stated before, the seasons change on Earth based on the tilt of the planet which changes the distance of that part of the planet from the sun. If a planet had no tilt, seasons could also change if the orbit of the planet was not circular but elliptical - thus changing the distance from the sun. With seasons occurring solely by tilt changes, seasons are opposite on the different sides of the pivot point (summer in one hemisphere, winter in the other). With seasons occurring solely by an elliptical orbital, the whole planet would have the same season.
CraZSpork wrote: |
As stated before, the seasons change on Earth based on the tilt of the planet which changes the distance of that part of the planet from the sun. If a planet had no tilt, seasons could also change if the orbit of the planet was not circular but elliptical - thus changing the distance from the sun. With seasons occurring solely by tilt changes, seasons are opposite on the different sides of the pivot point (summer in one hemisphere, winter in the other). With seasons occurring solely by an elliptical orbital, the whole planet would have the same season. |
arthuroys wrote: |
Something that I've been puzzling over ever since I saw Book 1: Water "Siege of the North". How is it that the sun rose and set at the North pole just like it would in the equator? |
arthuroys wrote: |
Something that I've been puzzling over ever since I saw Book 1: Water "Siege of the North". How is it that the sun rose and set at the North pole just like it would in the equator? At the poles of the planet, shouldn't there be a period of 6 months of daylight and 6 months of darkness? This is due to the tilt of the earth's axis and it's rotation around the sun. If we assume that the Earth on which Aang lives on does not have tilt in its axis, then there could be a regular sunrise and sunset, just like at the equator of the planet. However, if this were true, then there would be no seasonal changes - an impossibility in the world of Aang. So, my question is this: how is it possible that the sun rose and set during the Siege of the North within a matter of days unless the sun, the moon, and the stars are not really celestial bodies? I had always assumed that the celestials bodies in the world of Aang were both physical and spiritual. All thoughts welcome. |
phoenixfirework wrote: |
Wow, that's a good point. I never thought of that. It would suck to live at the North Pole with that amount of day and nighttime. So, considering spring was only three weeks away, should there have been six months of night or six months of day. |
sluggmunki_tx wrote: |
Oh, and this should be on the Ask a Question, Get and Answer thread. |
arthuroys wrote: |
Something that I've been puzzling over ever since I saw Book 1: Water "Siege of the North".?? How is it that the sun rose and set at the North pole just like it would in the equator??? At the poles of the planet, shouldn't there be a period of 6 months of daylight and 6 months of darkness? |
No. Winter Solstice took place several weeks to months before. We can safely assume it's late February-March in this episode. Therefore, that's not true. In the north, from early December to January or February the sun will hardly rise; but it won't be absolute blackout. And not for 6 months. Most of these scenes also take place at night.
therefore, 5 to 6 hours of sunlight seems VERY reasonable in this episode. It was also sometime around October-November in the series premiere, and the sun on the horizon thing was noticeable, and correct as well.
lostage wrote: |
Things to consider: 1. The moon is a fish swimming in a pond at the North Pole. If the fish wants the sun to rise as it would at the equator, I think it'd find a way. 2. Notice during the 2-part winter solstice episodes, no one was wearing coats or any cold weather stuff at all, even though it was supposed to be the middle of winter. In fact, the only places that were cold were the south and north poles. Obviously the writers wrote in the natural environmental changes only when it suited them. |
arthuroys wrote: |
Secondly, in that shrine at the North Pole, they weren't wearing coats for stated reasons. In every other part of the North Pole, everyone was dressed warmly. |
CraZSpork wrote: | ||
Although what you say is true, I believe lostage was discussing episodes 107 and 108 not episode 120. Episodes 107 and 108 occur during the winter solstice. The winter solstice is when the earth is farthest from the sun - the peak of winter. Lostage was wondering why the gaang wasn???t wearing winter clothes during this episode if it was the middle of winter. The answer could be simple. Regardless of what causes the seasons, the poles of a planet will be colder than the equator of the planet because the light of the sun hits the planet more direct at the equator than at the poles. This is why the equator of Earth is tropical year round. That area receives more direct sunlight. It is also why the poles are cold year round. They receive less direct sunlight. If episodes 107 and 108 occur near the equator, then the climate would be warmer. Remember the gang was traveling from the South Pole to the North Pole. They would have to cross the equator sometime, probably halfway through the season. |
lostage wrote: | ||||
That was partly what I meant, but I wasn't just talking about the equator. Think about Earth's geography. Virginia, for example, isn't too near the equator, but it's near enough to be warm. Even still, in the winter, a jacket is adviseable. Same goes for Texas, and even more so for more northern states, like Pennslyvania and Michigan. These kids were travelling around the world, and not just around the equator, and yet no one wore coats at all (except for at the poles, obviously). Okay, so they might have spent some time directly on the equator, but as they travelled north to the north pole, they should have worn coats, even while still in the Earth Kingdom. You don't have to be in Canada on Earth to experience cold weather, you can still be in Virginia and feel cold. Also, if the moon disappears when the fish disappears, then couldn't the fish make the moon fly over the north pole for normal day lengths if it so chose? I mean, we're all sophistocated scientific people, but can it be possible that this world is based off of old pre-Copernicus views of astronomy, especially considering this world comes fully equipped with its very own spirit world? |