We're moving Forums to the Community pages. Click here for more information and updates.

Avatar: The Last Airbender Forums

Nickelodeon (ended 2008)

Azula's Blue Firebending

  • Avatar of supersonicfan01

    supersonicfan01

    [21]Jun 3, 2006
    • member since: 05/06/05
    • level: 22
    • rank: Freak and Geek
    • posts: 4,186
    Magicalboy wrote:
    Herbert0 wrote:

    If you follow the Infrared scale

    (Strongest to weakest)

    White

    Yellow

    Orange

    Red

    Purple

    Blue

    Black.

    thats wrong


    Well, we know blue fire is hotter than red, and black fire is less hot than red, and white fire is hotter than any of them.
    You must be registered and logged in to post a message.
  • Avatar of animekitsune

    animekitsune

    [22]Jun 3, 2006
    • member since: 02/22/06
    • level: 6
    • rank: Small Wonder
    • posts: 3,715
    Herbert0 wrote:

    If you follow the Infrared scale

    (Strongest to weakest)

    White

    Yellow

    Orange

    Red

    Purple

    Blue

    Black.

    How the heck would you get fire down cool enough for it to get black without burning out?

    This is a??scale, from strongest to weakest:

    White

    Green

    Blue

    Yellow

    Red

    Don't expect me to get all of those right, all I know is that red is actually the coolest fire, despite the fact that it is hot enough to burn people badly.?? Blue is hotter than that, then green, and white is the hottest.?? the rest is just logical guesswork that you shouldn't trust.

    You must be registered and logged in to post a message.
  • Avatar of MCMLXVI

    MCMLXVI

    [23]Jun 3, 2006
    • member since: 11/08/05
    • level: 19
    • rank: Fall Guy
    • posts: 2,767
    animekitsune wrote:
    Herbert0 wrote:
    Black
    How the heck would you get fire down cool enough for it to get black without burning out?
    That's light we can't see -- invisible light, outside the visible spectrum
    You must be registered and logged in to post a message.
  • Avatar of UGamer08

    UGamer08

    [24]Jun 5, 2006
    • member since: 09/14/05
    • level: 23
    • rank: Close Talker
    • posts: 2,371
    Magicalboy wrote:
    U4ric wrote:
    UGamer08 wrote:

    PS: Am I the only one pissed off that we haven't seen Aang kill??in his Avatar State? Yeah, yeah??we all??saw what he did in The Siege of the North Part 2 but would it have been so bad to see some bodies floating around afterwards? Just one? Like in that episode of The Simpsons with the dolphins? I mean come on!!! ??Freakin' Y7 show limited network executives.

    I can't speak for everyone, but my initial reaction is yes you are (or at least I hope you are). I do not need to see bodies floating around just to get the idea of what happened. The creators and/or network??may have held back on even showing the final blow out of respect of the victims of the 2004 tsunami. If you need to see bodies so badly watch something else (like the news or countless other shows). I won't even go into how unbalanced I think this question is.

    watch Naruto..UGamer08,its bloody and u see tons of dead bodies

    I do sometimes but thanks anyway. And trust me, the stuff we get is kids stuff compared to the original kind they show in Japan. Its not even just the violence, the material, including dialog,??itself is set on a higher level. Why? Because the kids are smart and creators trust them??to be able to take it??or just change the channel. Not like here where our kids are messed up so we instinctively blame tv and go overboard with censors. I'm not some closeted necrophiliac or something (though some may disagree). I don't just flip around looking for??gore, I just expect to see some type of quality in each of the shows??I??like, including this one.??That doesn't neccessarily mean they have show a body, but if its neccessary, relevent,??and well-placed in the storyline, so be it, do what you have to do.

    Now I may like South Park as much as the next ??guy, but that doesn't mean I'm obsessed with blood and gore and all that other crap. I just feel that making the characters bleed once in a while (figure of speech for this one) makes them more human and the show more realistic.??As much as we'd like to, we can't just sit there and tell the kids it's??rasberry?? jelly.??(another Simpsons reference which is weird since i barely even like the show anymore). As for the whole floating dead bodies thing in general, dude, don't it so seriously. I mean, wow. ??I just thought that concept up because it reminded me of that particular Simpsons episode I like.?? Also I don't think the creators and/or network??planned on showing it at all. If they did, they most likely kicked it because of the rating rather than out of respect, since you know the thing happened almost a year ago by then, and people in America, being the ADD inflicted society??they??are, probably had said their "Oh that's too bad"s?? and let it slip right out of mind.??And ... well you know how producers like to use??every advantage they get. Also, even in the original Japanese??versions, we don't see that many bodies. Although I did guess that??a??lot of you would say something along those lines. Like??I said,??its not the bodies themselves, its what their purpose is on the show. (God I hate Drawn Togther so much now, gay, freakin' wannabee South Park)

    Wait weren't we talking about Azula's firebending? Ok wait hold on let me think of something : Blue fire is preeetty. Yeah, this thing will last about 2 seconds. Read it while you can, but only if you, you know, want to.

    You must be registered and logged in to post a message.
  • Avatar of Bluefiremaster

    Bluefiremaster

    [25]Dec 9, 2006
    • member since: 11/18/06
    • level: 6
    • rank: Small Wonder
    • posts: 994
    Cybertoy00 wrote:

    Hmmf. that might be it. Remember, whenever a??welding torch??is on the flame appears to blue, an indication of the level of heat. I think the 'burn chart' goes something like this.

    (from strongest to weakest)

    White

    Blue

    Yellow

    Red

    does that help?

    acctually it goes:

    White

    Purple

    lava

    lightning

    light blue

    blue

    dark blue

    green

    yellow

    orange

    orange-red

    red

    sparks

    You must be registered and logged in to post a message.
  • Avatar of salsadestroyer

    salsadestroyer

    [26]Dec 9, 2006
    • member since: 12/07/06
    • level: 5
    • rank: Caveman Lawyer
    • posts: 93
    Bluefiremaster wrote:
    Cybertoy00 wrote:

    Hmmf. that might be it. Remember, whenever a??welding torch??is on the flame appears to blue, an indication of the level of heat. I think the 'burn chart' goes something like this.

    (from strongest to weakest)

    White

    Blue

    Yellow

    Red

    does that help?

    acctually it goes:

    White

    Purple

    lava

    lightning

    light blue

    blue

    dark blue

    green

    yellow

    orange

    orange-red

    red

    sparks

    that sounds right. but wouldent lava or lighting go b4 white fire? and is magma the same as lava?

    btw i think purple fire would be really cool

    You must be registered and logged in to post a message.